Suppr超能文献

基于奖励的强化密度对同时戒除可卡因和海洛因的随机试验。

Randomized trial of prize-based reinforcement density for simultaneous abstinence from cocaine and heroin.

作者信息

Ghitza Udi E, Epstein David H, Schmittner John, Vahabzadeh Massoud, Lin Jia-Ling, Preston Kenzie L

机构信息

Treatment Section, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Branch, Intramural Research Program (IRP), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Health (NIH), MD, USA.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Oct;75(5):765-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.765.

Abstract

To examine the effect of reinforcer density in prize-based abstinence reinforcement, heroin/cocaine users (N = 116) in methadone maintenance (100 mg/day) were randomly assigned to a noncontingent control group (NonC) or to 1 of 3 groups that earned prize draws for abstinence: manual drawing with standard prize density (MS) or computerized drawing with standard (CS) or high (CH) density. Probabilities (prizes/draw) were standard (50%) and high (78%); prize density was double blind. Mean prize values were CH, $286; CS, $167; MS, $139; and NonC, $171. Outcomes were % opioid/cocaine-negative urines during the 12-week intervention and then 8 weeks postintervention as well as diagnosis of dependence up to 6 months poststudy. CH had significantly more negative specimens than did NonC during intervention and had more than all groups during postintervention treatment: Mean % negative (95% confidence interval) during postintervention treatment adjusted for baseline drug use and dropout were CH, 55% (14%-90%); CS, 7% (1%-27%); MS, 4% (1%-12%); and NonC, 3% (1%-10%). Current cocaine dependence diagnoses after treatment were significantly lower in contingent compared with noncontingent groups. Computerized drawing with higher-density prizes enhanced reduction of cocaine use; abstinence reinforcement had long-term therapeutic benefits.

摘要

为研究基于奖励的戒断强化中强化物密度的影响,对接受美沙酮维持治疗(每日100毫克)的海洛因/可卡因使用者(N = 116)进行随机分组,分为非偶然对照组(NonC)或3个因戒断获得抽奖奖励的组之一:标准奖励密度的手动抽奖组(MS)或标准(CS)或高(CH)密度的计算机化抽奖组。概率(奖品/抽奖)为标准(50%)和高(78%);奖励密度为双盲。平均奖品价值为CH组286美元;CS组167美元;MS组139美元;NonC组171美元。观察指标为12周干预期间以及干预后8周的阿片类药物/可卡因阴性尿液百分比,以及研究后长达6个月的依赖诊断情况。在干预期间,CH组的阴性样本显著多于NonC组,在干预后治疗期间,CH组的阴性样本多于所有其他组:根据基线药物使用情况和失访情况调整后的干预后治疗期间平均阴性百分比(95%置信区间)为CH组55%(14%-90%);CS组7%(1%-27%);MS组4%(1%-12%);NonC组3%(1%-10%)。与非偶然组相比,偶然组治疗后当前可卡因依赖诊断显著更低。具有更高密度奖品的计算机化抽奖增强了可卡因使用的减少;戒断强化具有长期治疗益处。

相似文献

9
Shaping cocaine abstinence by successive approximation.通过逐次渐近塑造可卡因戒断状态。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001 Aug;69(4):643-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.69.4.643.

引用本文的文献

2
Psychosocial interventions for stimulant use disorder.兴奋剂使用障碍的心理社会干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 15;2(2):CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub3.
7
The effects of synthetic cannabinoids on executive function.合成大麻素对执行功能的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Apr;234(7):1121-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4546-4. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Psychosocial interventions for psychostimulant misuse.针对精神兴奋剂滥用的社会心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 29;9(9):CD011866. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011866.pub2.

本文引用的文献

9
Do noncontingent vouchers increase drug use?非偶然性代金券会增加药物使用吗?
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003 Aug;11(3):195-201. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.11.3.195.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验