Mickes Laura, Wixted John T, Wais Peter E
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):858-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03194112.
Analyses of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) almost invariably suggest that, on a recognition memory test, the standard deviation of memory strengths associated with the lures (sigma(lure)) is smaller than that of the targets (sigma(target)). Often, sigma(lure)/ sigma(target) approximately = 0.80. However, that conclusion is based on a model that assumes that the memory strength distributions are Gaussian in form. In two experiments, we investigated this issue in a more direct way by asking subjects to simply rate the memory strengths of targets and lures using a 20-point or a 99-point strength scale. The results showed that the standard deviation of the ratings made to the targets (S(target)) was, indeed, larger than the standard deviation of the ratings made to the lures (S(lure)). Moreover, across subjects, the ratio S(lure)/ S(target) correlated highly with the estimate of sigma(lure)/ sigma(target) obtained from ROC analysis, and both estimates were, on average, approximately equal to 0.80.
对接受者操作特征(ROC)的分析几乎无一例外地表明,在识别记忆测试中,与诱饵相关的记忆强度的标准差(sigma(诱饵))小于目标的标准差(sigma(目标))。通常,sigma(诱饵)/sigma(目标)约等于0.80。然而,该结论基于一个假设记忆强度分布呈高斯形式的模型。在两项实验中,我们通过要求受试者使用20分制或99分制强度量表简单地对目标和诱饵的记忆强度进行评分,以更直接的方式研究了这个问题。结果表明,对目标的评分的标准差(S(目标))确实大于对诱饵的评分的标准差(S(诱饵))。此外,在所有受试者中,S(诱饵)/S(目标)的比率与从ROC分析中获得的sigma(诱饵)/sigma(目标)的估计值高度相关,并且这两个估计值平均约等于0.80。