Suppr超能文献

诱饵评价分布标准差的变化:对回忆概率估计的影响。

Variation in the standard deviation of the lure rating distribution: Implications for estimates of recollection probability.

机构信息

Psychology Department, George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Oct;24(5):1658-1664. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1232-9.

Abstract

In word recognition semantic priming of test words increased the false-alarm rate and the mean of confidence ratings to lures. Such priming also increased the standard deviation of confidence ratings to lures and the slope of the z-ROC function, suggesting that the priming increased the standard deviation of the lure evidence distribution. The Unequal Variance Signal Detection (UVSD) model interpreted the priming as increasing the standard deviation of the lure evidence distribution. Without additional parameters the Dual Process Signal Detection (DPSD) model could only accommodate the results by fitting the data for related and unrelated primes separately, interpreting the priming, implausibly, as decreasing the probability of target recollection (DPSD). With an additional parameter, for the probability of false (lure) recollection the model could fit the data for related and unrelated primes together, interpreting the priming as increasing the probability of false recollection. These results suggest that DPSD estimates of target recollection probability will decrease with increases in the lure confidence/evidence standard deviation unless a parameter is included for false recollection. Unfortunately the size of a given lure confidence/evidence standard deviation relative to other possible lure confidence/evidence standard deviations is often unspecified by context. Hence the model often has no way of estimating false recollection probability and thereby correcting its estimates of target recollection probability.

摘要

在单词识别中,测试词的语义启动会增加诱饵的虚报率和置信度评分的均值。这种启动还会增加诱饵的置信度评分的标准差和 z-ROC 函数的斜率,表明启动增加了诱饵证据分布的标准差。非均等方差信号检测(UVSD)模型将启动解释为增加诱饵证据分布的标准差。如果没有其他参数,双加工信号检测(DPSD)模型只能通过分别拟合相关和不相关启动的数据集来适应数据,不合理地将启动解释为降低目标回忆的概率(DPSD)。通过添加一个额外的参数,对于虚假(诱饵)回忆的概率,该模型可以将相关和不相关启动的数据集一起拟合,将启动解释为增加虚假回忆的概率。这些结果表明,除非包含虚假回忆的概率参数,否则 DPSD 对目标回忆概率的估计将随着诱饵置信度/证据标准差的增加而降低。不幸的是,给定诱饵置信度/证据标准差相对于其他可能的诱饵置信度/证据标准差的大小通常由上下文未指定。因此,该模型通常无法估计虚假回忆的概率,从而无法纠正其对目标回忆概率的估计。

相似文献

2
Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Oct;201:102933. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102933. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
The unitary zROC slope in amnesics does not reflect the absence of recollection: critical simulations in healthy participants of the zROC slope.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Sep;90:94-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.026. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Some-or-none recollection: Evidence from item and source memory.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 May;139(2):341-64. doi: 10.1037/a0018926.
5
6
Evidence for the contribution of a threshold retrieval process to semantic memory.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2026-2047. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1220607. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
7
ROC residuals in signal-detection models of recognition memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Feb;23(1):253-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0888-2.
8
"Remember" source memory ROCs indicate recollection is a continuous process.
Memory. 2010 Jan;18(1):27-39. doi: 10.1080/09658210903390061. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
9
Involvement of the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus in mediating recollection and familiarity.
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(9):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(03)00019-8.
10
Memory conjunction clusters: Influence of familiarity and recollection.
Memory. 2016 Jul;24(6):792-800. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1051052. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Greater target or lure variability? An exploration on the effects of stimulus types and memory paradigms.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Apr;52(3):554-573. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01483-7. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
2
Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Sep;76(9):2037-2052. doi: 10.1177/17470218221136498. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Recollection and familiarity in aging individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a literature review.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2014 Sep;24(3):313-31. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9265-6. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
3
Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):513-23. doi: 10.1037/a0025880.
4
Towards a functional organization of episodic memory in the medial temporal lobe.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Aug;36(7):1597-608. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
5
Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1536-42. doi: 10.1037/a0020448.
6
Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: a comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007).
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Jun;17(3):427-35. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.427.
7
The bias for a recognition judgement depends on the response emitted in a prior recognition judgement.
Memory. 2010 Apr;18(3):272-83. doi: 10.1080/09658211003601506. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
8
Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.
Psychol Rev. 2009 Jan;116(1):59-83. doi: 10.1037/a0014086.
10
A direct test of the unequal-variance signal detection model of recognition memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):858-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03194112.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验