Foy Robbie, Francis Jillian J, Johnston Marie, Eccles Martin, Lecouturier Jan, Bamford Claire, Grimshaw Jeremy
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec 19;7:207. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-207.
The development and description of interventions to change professional practice are often limited by the lack of an explicit theoretical and empirical basis. We set out to develop an intervention to promote appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia based on theoretical and empirical work.
We identified three key disclosure behaviours: finding out what the patient already knows or suspects about their diagnosis; using the actual words 'dementia' or 'Alzheimer's disease' when talking to the patient; and exploring what the diagnosis means to the patient. We conducted a questionnaire survey of older peoples' mental health teams (MHTs) based upon theoretical constructs from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and used the findings to identify factors that predicted mental health professionals' intentions to perform each behaviour. We selected behaviour change techniques likely to alter these factors.
The change techniques selected were: persuasive communication to target subjective norm; behavioural modelling and graded tasks to target self-efficacy; persuasive communication to target attitude towards the use of explicit terminology when talking to the patient; and behavioural modelling by MHTs to target perceived behavioural control for finding out what the patient already knows or suspects and exploring what the diagnosis means to the patient. We operationalised these behaviour change techniques using an interactive 'pen and paper' intervention designed to increase intentions to perform the three target behaviours.
It is feasible to develop an intervention to change professional behaviour based upon theoretical models, empirical data and evidence based behaviour change techniques. The next step is to evaluate the effect of such an intervention on behavioural intention. We argue that this approach to development and reporting of interventions will contribute to the science of implementation by providing replicable interventions that illuminate the principles and processes underlying change.
改变专业实践的干预措施的开发与描述往往因缺乏明确的理论和实证基础而受到限制。我们着手基于理论和实证工作开发一种干预措施,以促进对痴呆症诊断的恰当披露。
我们确定了三种关键的披露行为:了解患者对其诊断已经知道或怀疑的内容;与患者交谈时使用“痴呆症”或“阿尔茨海默病”的实际表述;探究该诊断对患者意味着什么。我们基于计划行为理论(TPB)和社会认知理论(SCT)的理论构建,对老年人心理健康团队(MHTs)进行了问卷调查,并利用调查结果确定预测心理健康专业人员实施每种行为意图的因素。我们选择了可能改变这些因素的行为改变技术。
所选的改变技术包括:针对主观规范的说服性沟通;针对自我效能感的行为示范和分级任务;针对与患者交谈时对使用明确术语的态度的说服性沟通;以及MHTs针对感知行为控制的行为示范,以了解患者已经知道或怀疑的内容,并探究该诊断对患者意味着什么。我们使用一种交互式“纸笔”干预措施将这些行为改变技术付诸实践,该干预措施旨在增强实施三种目标行为的意图。
基于理论模型、实证数据和循证行为改变技术开发改变专业行为的干预措施是可行的。下一步是评估这种干预措施对行为意图的影响。我们认为,这种干预措施的开发和报告方法将通过提供可复制的干预措施,阐明变革背后的原则和过程,从而为实施科学做出贡献。