• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective.个人自由与集体责任:经济流行病学视角
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 26;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-12.
2
Modelling collective effectiveness of voluntary vaccination with and without incentives.建模有无激励措施的自愿接种的集体效力。
Prev Vet Med. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):265-75. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
3
Individual decisions to vaccinate one's child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives.个人决定为孩子或自己接种疫苗:拒绝搭便车动机的离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;207:106-116. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.038. Epub 2018 May 1.
4
The case against libertarian arguments for compulsory vaccination.反对自由意志主义者强制接种疫苗论点的案例。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Nov;43(11):792-796. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103857. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
[Individual versus collective protection: bioethical analysis of the national program of mass child vaccination].
Cien Saude Colet. 2015 Jan;20(1):115-24. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014201.14882013.
6
Detrimental effects of introducing partial compulsory vaccination: experimental evidence.引入部分强制疫苗接种的有害影响:实验证据
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Jun;26(3):378-81. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv154. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
7
Victims, vectors and villains: are those who opt out of vaccination morally responsible for the deaths of others?受害者、传播者与作恶者:那些选择不接种疫苗的人是否要为他人的死亡承担道德责任?
J Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;42(12):762-768. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103327. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
8
Injury as externality: an economic perspective of trauma.作为外部性的伤害:创伤的经济学视角
Accid Anal Prev. 1987 Feb;19(1):29-37. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(87)90015-7.
9
Impacts of subsidy policies on vaccination decisions in contact networks.补贴政策对接触网络中疫苗接种决策的影响。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Jul;88(1):012813. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012813. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
10
Public preferences over efficiency, equity and autonomy in vaccination policy: an empirical study.公众对疫苗政策中效率、公平和自主的偏好:一项实证研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness of and attitude toward COVID-19 vaccination among individuals with COPD and the strategies to overcome vaccine hesitation: A mini review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对 COVID-19 疫苗的认知和态度,以及克服疫苗犹豫的策略:小型综述。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 15;19(3):2286686. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2286686. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
How the epidemiology of disease-resistant and disease-tolerant varieties affects grower behaviour.疾病抗性和耐受性品种的流行病学如何影响种植者行为。
J R Soc Interface. 2022 Oct;19(195):20220517. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0517. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
Addressing vaccine hesitancy and resistance for COVID-19 vaccines.应对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫和抵制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Jul;131:104241. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104241. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Uptake of Diagnostic Tests by Livestock Farmers: A Stochastic Game Theory Approach.畜牧养殖户对诊断测试的采用:一种随机博弈论方法。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Feb 5;7:36. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00036. eCollection 2020.
5
European citizens' opinions on immunisation.欧洲公民对免疫接种的看法。
Vaccine. 2008 Jan 17;26(3):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
6
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: too many rights make a wrong?个人自由与集体责任:权利过多会酿成错误吗?
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Oct 2;3:14. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual versus public priorities in the determination of optimal vaccination policies.确定最佳疫苗接种政策时的个人优先事项与公共优先事项
Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Dec;124(6):1012-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114471.

个人自由与集体责任:经济流行病学视角

Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective.

作者信息

Sadique M Zia

机构信息

Economics Department, City University, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006 Sep 26;3:12. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-3-12.

DOI:10.1186/1742-7622-3-12
PMID:17002804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1609166/
Abstract

Individuals' free choices in vaccination do not guarantee social optimum since individuals' decision is based on imperfect information, and vaccination decision involves positive externality. Public policy of compulsory vaccination or subsidised vaccination aims to increase aggregate private demand closer to social optimum. However, there is controversy over the effectiveness of public intervention compared to the free choice outcome in vaccination, and this article provides a brief discussion on this issue. It can be summarised that individuals' incentives to vaccination and accordingly their behavioural responses can greatly influence public policy's pursuit to control disease transmission, and compulsory (or subsidised) vaccination policy without incorporating such behavioural responses will not be able to achieve the best social outcome.

摘要

个人在疫苗接种方面的自由选择并不能保证社会最优,因为个人的决策基于不完美信息,且疫苗接种决策涉及正外部性。强制接种疫苗或补贴接种疫苗的公共政策旨在使总私人需求更接近社会最优。然而,与疫苗接种中的自由选择结果相比,公共干预的有效性存在争议,本文就此问题进行简要讨论。可以总结的是,个人接种疫苗的动机以及相应的行为反应会极大地影响公共政策控制疾病传播的追求,而不考虑这种行为反应的强制(或补贴)疫苗接种政策将无法实现最佳社会结果。