• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测腰痛患者对强效阿片类药物的长期反应:一项关于透皮芬太尼和吗啡的随机对照试验的结果

Predicting long-term response to strong opioids in patients with low back pain: findings from a randomized, controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl and morphine.

作者信息

Kalso Eija, Simpson Karen H, Slappendel Robert, Dejonckheere Joachim, Richarz Ute

机构信息

Pain Clinic, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2007 Dec 21;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-39.

DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-5-39
PMID:18154644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2242794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Some patients with long-standing low back pain will benefit from treatment with strong opioids. However, it would be helpful to predict which patients will have a good response. A fixed-term opioid trial has been recommended, but there is little evidence to suggest how long this trial should be. We assessed data from a large-scale randomized comparison of transdermal fentanyl (TDF) and sustained-release oral morphine (slow-release morphine; SRM) to determine characteristics of treatment responders.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a previously published 13-month randomized trial involving 680 patients with long-standing low back pain (median age 52 years, 61% women, median duration of back pain 87 months). Pain relief was recorded using visual analogue scales (VAS). Treatment response was defined as pain relief of at least 30% from baseline to any point during the trial. We used a step-wise logistic regression to identify variables that might predict response to treatment. Covariates included treatment group, sex, age, duration of pain, presence of neuropathic pain, baseline pain scores, educational/employment status, use of high doses of opioids, and social functioning (SF)-36 scores.

RESULTS

Over half the patients in both groups (n = 370; 54% TDF, 55% SRM) were treatment responders. There were no differences between the TDF and SRM responders in terms of age, sex, type or duration of pain between responders and non-responders. The difference in response to treatment between responders and non-responders could be detected at 3 weeks. Lack of response after 1 month had a stronger negative predictive value (i.e., ability to detect non-responders) than the presence of response after 1 month. The most influential factors for predicting a response were employment status (chi2 = 11.06, p = 0.0259) and use of high doses of opioids (chi2 = 3.04, p = 0.0811).

CONCLUSION

No clear pattern of baseline pain (type or severity) or patient characteristics emerged that could be used to predict responders before the start of opioid treatment. However, a 1-month trial period appears sufficient to determine response and tolerability in most cases.

摘要

背景

一些长期患有腰痛的患者将从强效阿片类药物治疗中获益。然而,预测哪些患者会有良好反应将很有帮助。已推荐进行定期阿片类药物试验,但几乎没有证据表明该试验应持续多长时间。我们评估了一项关于透皮芬太尼(TDF)和缓释口服吗啡(缓释吗啡;SRM)的大规模随机对照试验的数据,以确定治疗反应者的特征。

方法

这是对一项先前发表的为期13个月的随机试验的二次分析,该试验涉及680例长期腰痛患者(中位年龄52岁,61%为女性,腰痛中位持续时间87个月)。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录疼痛缓解情况。治疗反应定义为从基线到试验期间任何时间点疼痛缓解至少30%。我们使用逐步逻辑回归来确定可能预测治疗反应的变量。协变量包括治疗组、性别、年龄、疼痛持续时间、是否存在神经性疼痛、基线疼痛评分、教育/就业状况、高剂量阿片类药物的使用以及社会功能(SF)-36评分。

结果

两组中超过一半的患者(n = 370;TDF组为54%,SRM组为55%)是治疗反应者。TDF组和SRM组的反应者在年龄、性别、疼痛类型或持续时间方面,反应者与无反应者之间没有差异。在3周时可以检测到反应者与无反应者在治疗反应上的差异。1个月后无反应比1个月后有反应具有更强的阴性预测价值(即检测无反应者的能力)。预测反应的最有影响因素是就业状况(卡方 = 11.06,p = 0.0259)和高剂量阿片类药物的使用(卡方 = 3.04, p = 0.0811)。

结论

在阿片类药物治疗开始前,没有出现可用于预测反应者的明确的基线疼痛模式(类型或严重程度)或患者特征。然而,在大多数情况下,1个月的试验期似乎足以确定反应和耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/3e961a910bc0/1741-7015-5-39-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/4f5617697ea5/1741-7015-5-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/d15a30c07927/1741-7015-5-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/3e961a910bc0/1741-7015-5-39-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/4f5617697ea5/1741-7015-5-39-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/d15a30c07927/1741-7015-5-39-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ce/2242794/3e961a910bc0/1741-7015-5-39-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting long-term response to strong opioids in patients with low back pain: findings from a randomized, controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl and morphine.预测腰痛患者对强效阿片类药物的长期反应:一项关于透皮芬太尼和吗啡的随机对照试验的结果
BMC Med. 2007 Dec 21;5:39. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-39.
2
Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in patients with cancer and chronic non-cancer pain.透皮芬太尼与口服缓释吗啡治疗癌症及慢性非癌性疼痛患者的疗效与安全性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Sep;20(9):1419-28. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2114.
3
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
4
Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained release oral morphine in strong-opioid naïve patients with chronic low back pain.对于初次使用强效阿片类药物的慢性下腰痛患者,透皮芬太尼与缓释口服吗啡的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15;30(22):2484-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186860.23078.a8.
5
Comparison of TTS-fentanyl with sustained-release oral morphine in the treatment of patients not using opioids for mild-to-moderate pain.透皮贴剂芬太尼与缓释口服吗啡用于未使用阿片类药物的轻至中度疼痛患者治疗的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19(6):457-69. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002045.
6
An observational study of health-related quality of life and pain outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated with fentanyl transdermal system.一项关于接受芬太尼透皮贴剂治疗的慢性下腰痛患者健康相关生活质量和疼痛结局的观察性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jun;21(6):849-62. doi: 10.1185/030079905X46377.
7
Fentanyl buccal tablet for the relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult patients with chronic neuropathic pain: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.芬太尼口腔崩解片用于缓解阿片类药物耐受的成年慢性神经性疼痛患者的爆发性疼痛:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007 Apr;29(4):588-601. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.04.007.
8
Sustained-release oral morphine versus transdermal fentanyl and oral methadone in cancer pain management.缓释口服吗啡与透皮芬太尼及口服美沙酮在癌症疼痛管理中的比较
Eur J Pain. 2008 Nov;12(8):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
9
Factors predicting requirement of high-dose transdermal fentanyl in opioid switching from oral morphine or oxycodone in patients with cancer pain.预测癌症疼痛患者从口服吗啡或羟考酮转换为使用芬太尼透皮贴剂时需要高剂量的因素。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Oct;27(8):664-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182168fed.
10
Efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fentanyl spray 50 to 200 microg for breakthrough pain in patients with cancer: a phase III, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with a 10-month, open-label extension treatment period.鼻内注射50至200微克芬太尼喷雾剂对癌症患者爆发性疼痛的疗效和耐受性:一项III期、多国、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉试验,并有一个为期10个月的开放标签扩展治疗期。
Clin Ther. 2009 Jun;31(6):1177-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.05.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated guidelines for prescribing opioids to treat patients with chronic non-cancer pain in Korea: developed by committee on hospice and palliative care of the Korean Pain Society.韩国慢性非癌性疼痛患者阿片类药物处方更新指南:由韩国疼痛学会临终关怀与姑息治疗委员会制定。
Korean J Pain. 2024 Apr 1;37(2):119-131. doi: 10.3344/kjp.24022.
2
CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain - United States, 2022.美国疾病预防控制中心 2022 年《疼痛阿片类药物处方临床实践指南》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2022 Nov 4;71(3):1-95. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on chronic pain in Spain: a scoping review.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub)acute low back pain differ across treatment groups.(亚)急性下背痛患者的预后预测因素在不同治疗组之间存在差异。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1699-705. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224179.04964.aa.
2
Predictive factors for 1-year and 5-year outcome for disability in a working population of patients with low back pain treated in primary care.基层医疗中治疗的腰痛在职患者1年和5年残疾结局的预测因素。
Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.01.022. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
3
Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained release oral morphine in strong-opioid naïve patients with chronic low back pain.
新冠疫情对西班牙慢性疼痛的影响:一项范围综述
Pain Rep. 2021 Feb 16;6(1):e899. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000899. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
4
Re: Welk, , an opioid prescription for men undergoing minor urologic surgery is associated with an increased risk of new persistent opioid use.回复:对于接受小型泌尿外科手术的男性患者,开具阿片类药物处方与新的持续性阿片类药物使用风险增加有关。
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Oct;9(5):2299-2301. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-884.
5
Duloxetine 60 mg for chronic low back pain: post hoc responder analysis of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.度洛西汀60毫克用于慢性下腰痛:双盲、安慰剂对照试验的事后应答者分析
J Pain Res. 2017 Jul 24;10:1723-1731. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S138297. eCollection 2017.
6
Health-related quality of life in patients receiving long-term opioid therapy: a systematic review with meta-analysis.接受长期阿片类药物治疗患者的健康相关生活质量:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2017 Aug;26(8):1955-1967. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1538-0. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Fentanyl for neuropathic pain in adults.芬太尼用于成人神经性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 11;10(10):CD011605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011605.pub2.
8
Patient phenotyping in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.慢性疼痛治疗临床试验中的患者表型分析:IMMPACT建议
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1851-1871. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000602.
9
Opioids for neuropathic pain.用于神经性疼痛的阿片类药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 29;2013(8):CD006146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006146.pub2.
10
Opioids compared to placebo or other treatments for chronic low-back pain.与安慰剂或其他治疗方法相比,阿片类药物用于治疗慢性腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 27;2013(8):CD004959. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004959.pub4.
对于初次使用强效阿片类药物的慢性下腰痛患者,透皮芬太尼与缓释口服吗啡的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 15;30(22):2484-90. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186860.23078.a8.
4
The association between negative affect and opioid analgesia in patients with discogenic low back pain.椎间盘源性下腰痛患者的负面情绪与阿片类镇痛之间的关联。
Pain. 2005 Oct;117(3):450-461. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.006.
5
The Nordic Back Pain Subpopulation Program: validation and improvement of a predictive model for treatment outcome in patients with low back pain receiving chiropractic treatment.北欧腰痛亚人群项目:对接受脊椎按摩治疗的腰痛患者治疗结果预测模型的验证与改进
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005 Jul-Aug;28(6):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.06.008.
6
Efficacy and safety of opioid agonists in the treatment of neuropathic pain of nonmalignant origin: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.阿片类激动剂治疗非恶性来源神经病理性疼痛的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA. 2005 Jun 22;293(24):3043-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.24.3043.
7
Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety.阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛:疗效与安全性的系统评价
Pain. 2004 Dec;112(3):372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.019.
8
The nordic back pain subpopulation program: demographic and clinical predictors for outcome in patients receiving chiropractic treatment for persistent low back pain.北欧背痛亚人群项目:接受脊椎按摩治疗的持续性下背痛患者预后的人口统计学和临床预测因素
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Oct;27(8):493-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.08.001.
9
Efficacy and safety of transdermal fentanyl and sustained-release oral morphine in patients with cancer and chronic non-cancer pain.透皮芬太尼与口服缓释吗啡治疗癌症及慢性非癌性疼痛患者的疗效与安全性
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Sep;20(9):1419-28. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2114.
10
Outcome determinants of subacute low back pain.亚急性下腰痛的预后决定因素。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2634-40. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099097.61495.2E.