Leon Alejandro, Donahue Sean P, Morrison David G, Estes Robert L, Li Chun
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8808, USA.
J AAPOS. 2008 Apr;12(2):150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.10.003. Epub 2007 Dec 26.
Anisometropia is an important cause of amblyopia. The relationship between anisometropia depth and amblyopia magnitude is not well characterized, as previous studies have been limited to patients identified because of their amblyopia. We analyzed results from anisometropic patients identified with photoscreening to eliminate this selection bias.
We performed a retrospective observational study of preschool children with anisometropia >1.0 D identified during a statewide photoscreening program. Nine hundred seventy-four children with anisometropia were detected over a 9-year period. Visual acuity, cycloplegic refraction data, and patient age from a formal follow-up examination were analyzed. Effect of anisometropia magnitude on amblyopia was measured by ordinal logistic regression, taking age into account.
Six hundred forty (65.7%) children had amblyopia > or =2 lines. Three hundred sixty-four (37.4%) had > or =4 lines amblyopia. There was a statistically significant increase in risk of amblyopia with increasing magnitude of anisometropia. Calculated odds ratios for amblyopia with maximal meridional anisometropia of > or =2 to <4 D compared with >1 to <2 D was 2.13 (95% CI [1.63, 2.78], p < 1 x 10(-7)), and 2.34 (95% CI [1.67, 3.28], p < 1 x 10(-6)) when comparing > or =4 D to > or =2 to <4 D. Odds ratios for spherical equivalent anisometropia were also highly statistically significant.
Children with higher magnitudes of anisometropia had higher prevalence and greater depth of amblyopia. Older children had an increased risk of amblyopia compared with younger children for moderate levels of anisometropia. Low magnitude anisometropia in young children may not predispose to amblyopia; these findings have implications for vision screening criteria at various ages.
屈光参差是弱视的一个重要病因。由于先前的研究仅限于因弱视而被确诊的患者,屈光参差程度与弱视严重程度之间的关系尚未得到充分描述。我们分析了通过照片筛查确定的屈光参差患者的结果,以消除这种选择偏倚。
我们对在全州范围内的照片筛查项目中发现的屈光参差度数>1.0 D的学龄前儿童进行了一项回顾性观察研究。在9年期间共检测出974例屈光参差儿童。分析了来自正式随访检查的视力、睫状肌麻痹验光数据和患者年龄。通过有序逻辑回归分析,考虑年龄因素,测量屈光参差程度对弱视的影响。
640名(65.7%)儿童弱视程度≥2行。364名(37.4%)儿童弱视程度≥4行。随着屈光参差程度的增加,弱视风险有统计学意义的增加。最大子午线屈光参差≥2 D至<4 D与>1 D至<2 D相比,弱视的计算比值比为2.13(95%可信区间[1.63, 2.78],p<1×10⁻⁷),当比较≥4 D与≥2 D至<4 D时,比值比为2.34(95%可信区间[1.67, 3.28],p<1×10⁻⁶)。等效球镜屈光参差的比值比也具有高度统计学意义。
屈光参差程度较高的儿童弱视患病率更高,弱视程度更深。对于中度屈光参差水平,年龄较大的儿童与年龄较小的儿童相比,弱视风险增加。幼儿低度屈光参差可能不会导致弱视;这些发现对不同年龄段的视力筛查标准具有启示意义。