• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部用利多卡因缓解急性中耳炎疼痛:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机试验的结果

Topical lignocaine for pain relief in acute otitis media: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial.

作者信息

Bolt Penny, Barnett Peter, Babl Franz E, Sharwood Lisa N

机构信息

Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Murdoch Children's Research Institute and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jan;93(1):40-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.110429.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2006.110429
PMID:18156478
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acute otitis media (AOM) is common in children, yet the optimal management of ear pain associated with AOM has not been well studied. We set out to determine the efficacy of topical aqueous 2% lignocaine eardrops compared with a placebo (saline) for pain relief of AOM in children.

DESIGN

Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary children's hospital emergency department.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Children aged between 3 and 17 years with earache and AOM without evidence of perforation were eligible. Patients were randomised to receive either 2% lignocaine or saline eardrops (placebo).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain scores were measured before and after ear-drop administration. Patient and physician-interpreted pain scores were measured by using the Bieri faces pain scale and visual analogue scale at 10, 20 and 30 minutes. The primary outcome measure was reduction in patient-measured pain scores by 50% from the baseline. Secondary outcome measures were reduction in patient-measured pain scores by 25% or by at least two points. Telephone follow-up occurred after 1 day and 1 week. Analysis was by intention to treat.

RESULTS

63 children (31 were treated with lignocaine, 32 with placebo) aged 3 to 12 years were enrolled. The groups were demographically and clinically similar, with similar proportions having received analgesia in the preceding 4 hours. Children receiving lignocaine showed significantly lower patient-measured pain scores with a reduction by 50% from baseline at 10 minutes (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.11, p = 0.03) and 30 minutes (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.93, p = 0.009) but not at 20 minutes (RR 1.35 95% CI 0.88-2.06). The response to lignocaine treatment showed significantly lower patient-measured pain scores for 25% reduction at all time points and for two-point reduction at 10 minutes and favoured lignocaine at 20 minutes and 30 minutes without reaching statistical significance. There were no serious adverse events during the 30 minute follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that topical aqueous 2% lignocaine eardrops provide rapid relief for many young children presenting with ear pain attributed to AOM. The concurrent use of simple oral analgesia is a likely contributor to effective management of this painful childhood condition.

摘要

目的

急性中耳炎(AOM)在儿童中很常见,但与AOM相关的耳痛的最佳治疗方法尚未得到充分研究。我们旨在确定与安慰剂(盐水)相比,局部使用2%利多卡因水性耳滴对缓解儿童AOM耳痛的疗效。

设计

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。

地点

三级儿童医院急诊科。

患者和干预措施

年龄在3至17岁之间、有耳痛且AOM无穿孔迹象的儿童符合条件。患者被随机分配接受2%利多卡因或盐水耳滴(安慰剂)。

主要观察指标

在滴耳前后测量疼痛评分。在10、20和30分钟时,使用比耶里面部疼痛量表和视觉模拟量表测量患者和医生解读的疼痛评分。主要观察指标是患者测量的疼痛评分从基线降低50%。次要观察指标是患者测量的疼痛评分降低25%或至少降低2分。在1天和1周后进行电话随访。分析采用意向性分析。

结果

纳入了63名年龄在3至12岁之间的儿童(31名接受利多卡因治疗,32名接受安慰剂治疗)。两组在人口统计学和临床特征上相似,在前4小时内接受镇痛的比例相似。接受利多卡因治疗的儿童在10分钟(RR 2.06,95%CI 1.03 - 4.11,p = 0.03)和30分钟(RR 1.44,95%CI 1.07 - 1.93,p = 0.009)时患者测量的疼痛评分显著低于基线,降低了50%,但在20分钟时未降低(RR 1.35,95%CI 0.88 - 2.06)。利多卡因治疗的反应在所有时间点患者测量的疼痛评分降低25%以及在10分钟时降低至少2分方面均显著较低,在20分钟和30分钟时利多卡因更有优势,但未达到统计学意义。在30分钟的随访期内没有严重不良事件。

结论

本研究表明,局部使用2%利多卡因水性耳滴可为许多因AOM出现耳痛的幼儿提供快速缓解。同时使用简单的口服镇痛药可能有助于有效治疗这种疼痛的儿童疾病。

相似文献

1
Topical lignocaine for pain relief in acute otitis media: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial.局部用利多卡因缓解急性中耳炎疼痛:一项双盲安慰剂对照随机试验的结果
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jan;93(1):40-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.2006.110429.
2
A randomized controlled trial comparing a fascia iliaca compartment nerve block to a traditional systemic analgesic for femur fractures in a pediatric emergency department.一项在儿科急诊科进行的随机对照试验,比较髂筋膜间隙神经阻滞与传统全身镇痛药用于股骨骨折的效果。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Aug;50(2):162-71, 171.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.09.006. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
3
Does nebulized lidocaine reduce the pain and distress of nasogastric tube insertion in young children? A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.雾化利多卡因能否减轻幼儿鼻胃管插入时的疼痛和不适感?一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2009 Jun;123(6):1548-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1897.
4
Oral dexamethasone for the treatment of pain in children with acute pharyngitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.口服地塞米松治疗儿童急性咽炎疼痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):601-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.136.
5
Randomized clinical trial of nebulized fentanyl citrate versus i.v. fentanyl citrate in children presenting to the emergency department with acute pain.雾化枸橼酸芬太尼与静脉注射枸橼酸芬太尼用于急诊科急性疼痛患儿的随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Oct;14(10):895-8. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.06.036.
6
Amethocaine versus EMLA for successful intravenous cannulation in a children's emergency department: a randomised controlled study.儿童急诊科使用丁卡因与复方利多卡因乳膏进行成功静脉置管的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jul;26(7):487-91. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.065110.
7
A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.一项比较鼻内给予芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于急诊科儿童急性疼痛管理的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
8
Comparison of topical anesthetics without cocaine to tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine and lidocaine infiltration during repair of lacerations: bupivacaine-norepinephrine is an effective new topical anesthetic agent.在伤口缝合修复过程中,不含可卡因的局部麻醉剂与丁卡因-肾上腺素-可卡因及利多卡因浸润麻醉的比较:布比卡因-去甲肾上腺素是一种有效的新型局部麻醉剂。
Pediatrics. 1996 Mar;97(3):301-7.
9
Analgesic efficacy of celecoxib in postoperative oral surgery pain: a single-dose, two-center, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study.塞来昔布对口腔外科术后疼痛的镇痛效果:一项单剂量、双中心、随机、双盲、活性药物与安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2498-510. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.008.
10
Warm lidocaine/tetracaine patch versus placebo before pediatric intravenous cannulation: a randomized controlled trial.小儿静脉置管前使用温利多卡因/丁卡因贴剂与安慰剂的对比:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jul;52(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.336. Epub 2008 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Ear health and quality of life in pet rabbits of differing ear conformations: A UK survey of owner-reported signalment risk factors and effects on rabbit welfare and behaviour.不同耳型宠物兔的耳部健康和生活质量:英国一项基于主人报告的特征风险因素调查及其对兔福利和行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0285372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285372. eCollection 2023.
2
Controlled release of ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone from a single ototopical administration of antibiotic-loaded polymer microspheres and thermoresponsive gel.抗生素载药聚合物微球和温敏凝胶单次耳用给药的环丙沙星和头孢曲松的控释。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240535. eCollection 2020.
3
Transtympanic Delivery of Local Anesthetics for Pain in Acute Otitis Media.
经鼓室给予局部麻醉药治疗急性中耳炎疼痛。
Mol Pharm. 2019 Apr 1;16(4):1555-1562. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01235. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
Evidence and evidence gaps in the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and otitis media.咽鼓管功能障碍和中耳炎治疗中的证据及证据空白
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc05. doi: 10.3205/cto000132. eCollection 2016.
5
Contemporary concepts in management of acute otitis media in children.儿童急性中耳炎管理的当代概念
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2014 Oct;47(5):651-72. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Use anesthetic drops to relieve acute otitis media pain.使用麻醉滴剂缓解急性中耳炎疼痛。
J Fam Pract. 2008 Jun;57(6):370-3.
7
Topical analgesia for acute otitis media.急性中耳炎的局部镇痛
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD005657. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005657.pub2.