Senn Nicolas, D'Acremont Valérie, Landry Pierre, Genton Blaise
Travel Clinic, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Switzerland.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6):1010-4.
Three different drugs (mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil, doxycycline) are recommended for malaria chemoprophylaxis, each with approximately the same efficacy but various adverse event profiles, regimens, and prices. We investigated which medication the travelers would have chosen on the basis of written evidence-based information and the impact that pretravel consultation had on their decision. A prospective study was performed in a travel clinic and private practice, and 1073 travelers were included; 45% chose mefloquine (Lariam or Mephaquine), 21% atovaquone/proguanil (Malarone), 18% doxycycline (Supracycline), 5% "no prophylaxis," and 11% "do not know." Lariam was principally chosen because of prior experience (38%), Mephaquine because of low price (34%), and doxycycline and Malarone because of the profile of adverse events (55% and 43%, respectively). Based on objective written information, travelers most frequently chose mefloquine for chemoprophylaxis. This suggests that evidence-based information weighs more heavily than negative publicity. Taking into account the perspective of the user should improve appropriateness of the pretravel advice.
三种不同的药物(甲氟喹、阿托伐醌/氯胍、多西环素)被推荐用于疟疾预防,它们的疗效大致相同,但不良事件情况、用药方案和价格各异。我们调查了旅行者在基于循证信息的书面材料情况下会选择哪种药物,以及旅行前咨询对他们决策的影响。在一家旅行诊所和私人诊所开展了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了1073名旅行者;45%选择甲氟喹(malarone或Mephaquine),21%选择阿托伐醌/氯胍(malarone),18%选择多西环素(Supracycline),5%选择“不预防”,11%选择“不知道”。选择malarone主要是因为既往经验(38%),选择Mephaquine是因为价格低(34%),选择多西环素和malarone是因为不良事件情况(分别为55%和43%)。基于客观的书面信息,旅行者最常选择甲氟喹进行预防。这表明循证信息比负面宣传的影响更大。考虑用户的观点应能提高旅行前建议的恰当性。