Muftuoglu Orkun, Erdem Uzeyir
Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.022.
To evaluate internal refraction and its relation to other optical properties of the eye across a large range of refractive errors, which can provide useful information for the assessment and design of intraocular lenses and corneal ablation patterns.
Cohort study.
Three hundred ninety-four eyes of 197 healthy subjects with a mean age of 27+/-7 years (range, 18-42).
All eyes underwent optical path difference scans to evaluate corneal topography, whole and internal ocular refraction (determined by the subtraction of corneal refraction from whole ocular refraction), and total and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) were assessed. After the conversion of any spherocylindrical refractive errors to vectorial data (sphere equivalent, blurring strength; cylinder, J(0) [power of Jackson cross cylinder at 90 degrees and 180 degrees] and J45 [power of Jackson cross cylinder at 45 degrees and 135 degrees]), the distribution of internal refraction among refraction groups (high myopes, low to moderate myopes, hyperopes, mixed astigmats, and emmetropes) and relationships between internal refraction, corneal refraction, and wavefront aberrations were analyzed. The compensation relation and its rate between corneal and internal astigmatism was assessed by the compensation factor (CF).
Whole ocular power and astigmatism, corneal power and astigmatism, internal power and astigmatism, CF for astigmatic data, location of the highest internal refraction zone, and wavefront aberrations.
The highest refraction zone was mostly (90%) located in the center in myopes, whereas it was located at the nasal side (71%) in hyperopes. There was a significant correlation between whole ocular and internal powers (P<0.01), but no correlation was observed between corneal and internal powers (P>0.05). Internal astigmatism was mostly against the rule. The mean CF J(0) was 0.63+/-3.78 and CF J(45) was 0.57+/-2.47. The magnitude of the internal astigmatism under the 3-mm zone was correlated with the magnitude of corneal astigmatism (P<0.05). The distribution of astigmatic CF differed among refraction groups. There were significant correlations between internal power and spherical aberration (P<0.05) and internal cylinder under the 5-mm zone and HOAs (P<0.001).
There is a remarkable tilt in internal refraction in hyperopes. Although there is a tendency of undercompensation of the corneal astigmatism by internal astigmatism in the entire group of eyes, the compensation differs among refraction groups.
评估大范围屈光不正患者眼内折射及其与眼的其他光学特性之间的关系,这可为人工晶状体和角膜消融模式的评估与设计提供有用信息。
队列研究。
197名健康受试者的394只眼,平均年龄27±7岁(范围18 - 42岁)。
所有眼睛均接受光程差扫描,以评估角膜地形图、全眼及眼内折射(通过全眼折射减去角膜折射确定),并评估总像差和高阶像差(HOAs)。将任何球柱面屈光不正转换为矢量数据(等效球镜、模糊强度;柱镜,J(0) [90度和180度处杰克逊交叉柱镜的度数] 以及J45 [45度和135度处杰克逊交叉柱镜的度数])后,分析折射组(高度近视、低度至中度近视、远视、混合散光和正视)之间眼内折射的分布情况以及眼内折射、角膜折射和波前像差之间的关系。通过补偿因子(CF)评估角膜散光和眼内散光之间的补偿关系及其比率。
全眼屈光力和散光、角膜屈光力和散光、眼内屈光力和散光、散光数据的CF、最高眼内折射区的位置以及波前像差。
近视眼中最高折射区大多(90%)位于中央,而远视眼中最高折射区位于鼻侧(71%)。全眼屈光力与眼内屈光力之间存在显著相关性(P<0.01),但角膜屈光力与眼内屈光力之间未观察到相关性(P>0.05)。眼内散光大多为逆规性。平均CF J(0)为0.63±3.78,CF J(45)为0.57±2.47。3mm区域内眼内散光的大小与角膜散光的大小相关(P<0.05)。散光CF的分布在不同折射组之间存在差异。眼内屈光力与球差之间存在显著相关性(P<0.05),5mm区域内眼内柱镜与高阶像差之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001)。
远视眼中眼内折射存在明显倾斜。尽管在整个眼组中眼内散光对角膜散光有欠补偿的趋势,但不同折射组之间的补偿情况有所不同。