Zutavern Anne, Brockow Inken, Schaaf Beate, von Berg Andrea, Diez Ulrike, Borte Michael, Kraemer Ursula, Herbarth Olf, Behrendt Heidrun, Wichmann H-Erich, Heinrich Joachim
GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Epidemiology, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany.
Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):e44-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3553.
Current prophylactic feeding guidelines recommend a delayed introduction of solids for the prevention of atopic diseases. This study investigates whether a delayed introduction of solids (past 4 or 6 months) is protective against the development of eczema, asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food or inhalant sensitization at the age of 6 years.
Data from 2073 children in the ongoing LISA birth cohort study were analyzed at 6 years of age. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for all children and for children without skin or allergic symptoms within the first 6 months of life to take into account reverse causality.
A delayed introduction of solids (past 4 or 6 months) was not associated with decreased odds for asthma, allergic rhinitis, or sensitization against food or inhalant allergens at 6 years of age. On the contrary, food sensitization was more frequent in children who were introduced to solids later. The relationship between the timing of solid food introduction and eczema was not clear. There was no protective effect of a late introduction of solids or a less diverse diet within the first 4 months of life. However, in children without early skin or allergic symptoms were considered, eczema was significantly more frequent in children who received a more diverse diet within the first 4 months.
This study found no evidence supporting a delayed introduction of solids beyond 4 or 6 months for the prevention of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and food or inhalant sensitization at the age of 6 years. For eczema, the results were conflicting, and a protective effect of a delayed introduction of solids cannot be excluded. Positive associations between late introduction of solids and food sensitization have to be interpreted with caution. A true protective effect of a delayed introduction of solids on food sensitization seems unlikely.
当前的预防性喂养指南建议延迟引入固体食物以预防过敏性疾病。本研究调查延迟引入固体食物(超过4或6个月)是否能预防6岁时湿疹、哮喘、过敏性鼻炎以及食物或吸入性致敏的发生。
对正在进行的LISA出生队列研究中的2073名儿童在6岁时的数据进行分析。对所有儿童以及出生后头6个月内无皮肤或过敏症状的儿童进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以考虑反向因果关系。
延迟引入固体食物(超过4或6个月)与6岁时哮喘、过敏性鼻炎或对食物或吸入性过敏原致敏的几率降低无关。相反,固体食物引入较晚的儿童食物致敏更为常见。固体食物引入时间与湿疹之间的关系尚不清楚。在出生后头4个月内延迟引入固体食物或饮食种类较少并无保护作用。然而,在考虑无早期皮肤或过敏症状的儿童时,出生后头4个月内饮食种类较多的儿童湿疹明显更为常见。
本研究没有发现证据支持为预防6岁时的哮喘、过敏性鼻炎以及食物或吸入性致敏而延迟至4或6个月以上引入固体食物。对于湿疹,结果存在矛盾,不能排除延迟引入固体食物的保护作用。固体食物引入较晚与食物致敏之间的正相关关系必须谨慎解读。延迟引入固体食物对食物致敏的真正保护作用似乎不太可能。