Parshuram Christopher S, To Teresa, Seto Winnie, Trope Angela, Koren Gideon, Laupacis Andreas
Department of Critical Care Medicine, and the Center for Safety Research, Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, the Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 2008 Jan 1;178(1):42-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.061743.
Errors in the concentration of intravenous medications are not uncommon. We evaluated steps in the infusion-preparation process to identify factors associated with preventable medication errors.
We included 118 health care professionals who would be involved in the preparation of intravenous medication infusions as part of their regular clinical activities. Participants performed 5 infusion-preparation tasks (drug-volume calculation, rounding, volume measurement, dose-volume calculation, mixing) and prepared 4 morphine infusions to specified concentrations. The primary outcome was the occurrence of error (deviation of > 5% for volume measurement and > 10% for other measures). The secondary outcome was the magnitude of error.
Participants performed 1180 drug-volume calculations, 1180 rounding calculations and made 1767 syringe-volume measurements, and they prepared 464 morphine infusions. We detected errors in 58 (4.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7% to 6.2%) drug-volume calculations, 30 (2.5%, 95% CI 1.6% to 3.4%) rounding calculations and 29 (1.6%, 95% CI 1.1% to 2.2%) volume measurements. We found 7 errors (1.6%, 95% CI 0.4% to 2.7%) in drug mixing. Of the 464 infusion preparations, 161 (34.7%, 95% CI 30.4% to 39%) contained concentration errors. Calculator use was associated with fewer errors in dose-volume calculations (4% v. 10%, p = 0.001). Four factors were positively associated with the occurrence of a concentration error: fewer infusions prepared in the previous week (p = 0.007), increased number of years of professional experience (p = 0.01), the use of the more concentrated stock solution (p < 0.001) and the preparation of smaller dose volumes (p < 0.001). Larger magnitude errors were associated with fewer hours of sleep in the previous 24 hours (p = 0.02), the use of more concentrated solutions (p < 0.001) and preparation of smaller infusion doses (p < 0.001).
Our data suggest that the reduction of provider fatigue and production of pediatric-strength solutions or industry-prepared infusions may reduce medication errors.
静脉用药浓度错误并不罕见。我们评估了输液配制过程中的各个步骤,以确定与可预防用药错误相关的因素。
我们纳入了118名医疗保健专业人员,他们在日常临床活动中参与静脉用药输液的配制。参与者执行5项输液配制任务(药物体积计算、四舍五入、体积测量、剂量体积计算、混合),并配制4种指定浓度的吗啡输液。主要结局是错误的发生情况(体积测量偏差>5%,其他测量偏差>10%)。次要结局是错误的大小。
参与者进行了1180次药物体积计算、1180次四舍五入计算,进行了1767次注射器体积测量,并配制了464次吗啡输液。我们在58次(4.9%,95%置信区间[CI]3.7%至6.2%)药物体积计算、30次(2.5%,95%CI 1.6%至3.4%)四舍五入计算和29次(1.6%,95%CI 1.1%至2.2%)体积测量中检测到错误。我们在药物混合中发现7次错误(1.6%,95%CI 0.4%至2.7%)。在464次输液配制中,161次(34.7%,95%CI 30.4%至39%)存在浓度错误。使用计算器与剂量体积计算中的错误较少相关(4%对10%,p = 0.001)。四个因素与浓度错误的发生呈正相关:前一周配制的输液较少(p = 0.007)、专业经验年限增加(p = 0.01)、使用浓度更高的储备溶液(p < 0.001)以及配制较小剂量体积(p < 0.001)。更大的错误大小与前24小时睡眠小时数较少(p = 0.02)、使用浓度更高的溶液(p < 0.001)以及配制较小输液剂量(p < 0.001)相关。
我们的数据表明,减少医护人员疲劳以及生产儿童强度溶液或由行业配制的输液可能会减少用药错误。