Saint Sanjay, Kowalski Christine P, Kaufman Samuel R, Hofer Timothy P, Kauffman Carol A, Olmsted Russell N, Forman Jane, Banaszak-Holl Jane, Damschroder Laura, Krein Sarah L
Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jan 15;46(2):243-50. doi: 10.1086/524662.
Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection in the United States, to our knowledge, no national data exist describing what hospitals in the United States are doing to prevent this patient safety problem. We conducted a national study to examine the current practices used by hospitals to prevent hospital-acquired UTI.
We mailed written surveys to infection control coordinators at a national random sample of nonfederal US hospitals with an intensive care unit and >or=50 hospital beds (n=600) and to all Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals (n=119). The survey asked about practices to prevent hospital-acquired UTI and other device-associated infections.
The response rate was 72%. Overall, 56% of hospitals did not have a system for monitoring which patients had urinary catheters placed, and 74% did not monitor catheter duration. Thirty percent of hospitals reported regularly using antimicrobial urinary catheters and portable bladder scanners; 14% used condom catheters, and 9% used catheter reminders. VA hospitals were more likely than non-VA hospitals to use portable bladder scanners (49% vs. 29%; P=.001), condom catheters (46% vs. 12%; P=.001), and suprapubic catheters (22% vs. 9%; P=.001); non-VA hospitals were more likely to use antimicrobial urinary catheters (30% vs. 14%; P=.001).
Despite the strong link between urinary catheters and subsequent UTI, we found no strategy that appeared to be widely used to prevent hospital-acquired UTI. The most commonly used practices--bladder ultrasound and antimicrobial catheters--were each used in fewer than one-third of hospitals, and urinary catheter reminders, which have proven benefits, were used in <10% of US hospitals.
尽管在美国尿路感染(UTI)是最常见的医院获得性感染,但据我们所知,尚无全国性数据描述美国医院为预防这一患者安全问题所采取的措施。我们开展了一项全国性研究,以调查医院当前用于预防医院获得性UTI的做法。
我们向美国非联邦医院中随机抽取的、设有重症监护病房且床位≥50张的医院(n = 600)的感染控制协调员以及所有退伍军人事务部(VA)医院(n = 119)邮寄了书面调查问卷。该问卷询问了预防医院获得性UTI及其他与器械相关感染的做法。
回复率为72%。总体而言,56%的医院没有监测哪些患者留置了导尿管的系统,74%的医院未监测导尿管留置时间。30%的医院报告经常使用抗菌导尿管和便携式膀胱扫描仪;14%的医院使用避孕套导尿管,9%的医院使用导尿管提醒装置。VA医院比非VA医院更有可能使用便携式膀胱扫描仪(49%对29%;P = 0.001)、避孕套导尿管(46%对12%;P = 0.001)和耻骨上导尿管(22%对9%;P = 0.001);非VA医院更有可能使用抗菌导尿管(30%对14%;P = 0.001)。
尽管导尿管与随后发生的UTI之间存在密切关联,但我们发现没有一种策略似乎被广泛用于预防医院获得性UTI。最常用的做法——膀胱超声检查和抗菌导尿管——在不到三分之一的医院中使用,而已证实有好处的导尿管提醒装置在美国医院中的使用率不到10%。