Sandler A D, Bodfish J W
Olson Huff Center, Mission Children's Hospital, Asheville, NC, and Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Child Care Health Dev. 2008 Jan;34(1):104-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00797.x.
This study examined short-term efficacy, side effects and acceptability of a placebo treatment procedure designed to maintain children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on 50% of their usual stimulant dose.
An open-label prospective crossover trial was conducted in 26 children with ADHD, ages 7-15 years, stable on stimulant therapy, followed at a community-based developmental paediatrics ADHD clinic. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two orders of experimental conditions: (1) baseline (100%) dose (1 week), then 50% dose (1 week), then 50% dose + placebo (1 week), or (2) baseline (100%), then 50% dose + placebo, then 50% dose. The inert nature of the placebo was fully disclosed to parent and child. Treatment was open-label for child, parents and physician, but single blind for teachers. Main outcome measures included weekly IOWA Conners parent and teacher rating scales, the Pittsburgh side effects rating scale (PSERS) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale.
Parent IOWA showed ADHD behaviour tended to remain the same when the dose of stimulant medication was reduced with placebo but to deteriorate when the dose was reduced without placebo. There were no significant differences between conditions on the Teacher IOWA. PSERS scores were higher at baseline than on 50% dose. On the CGI, there was a significant difference (P = 0.004) between the 50% dose and the 50% + placebo conditions. Individual subject analysis showed that eight subjects met criteria for responder.
Results indicate that the open-label placebo treatment was acceptable and efficacious in the short term for some children.
本研究考察了一种安慰剂治疗程序的短期疗效、副作用及可接受性,该程序旨在使注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童维持在其常用兴奋剂剂量的50%。
在一家社区发育儿科ADHD诊所,对26名7至15岁、兴奋剂治疗稳定的ADHD儿童进行了一项开放标签前瞻性交叉试验。受试者被随机分配到两种实验条件顺序之一:(1)基线(100%)剂量(1周),然后50%剂量(1周),然后50%剂量+安慰剂(1周),或(2)基线(100%),然后50%剂量+安慰剂,然后50%剂量。向家长和儿童充分披露了安慰剂的惰性。治疗对儿童、家长和医生为开放标签,但对教师为单盲。主要结局指标包括每周爱荷华康纳斯家长和教师评定量表、匹兹堡副作用评定量表(PSERS)和临床总体印象(CGI)量表。
家长版爱荷华量表显示,当用安慰剂降低兴奋剂药物剂量时,ADHD行为倾向于保持不变,但在未使用安慰剂降低剂量时则会恶化。教师版爱荷华量表在不同条件之间没有显著差异。PSERS评分在基线时高于50%剂量时。在CGI上,50%剂量组和50%+安慰剂组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.004)。个体受试者分析显示,有8名受试者符合反应者标准。
结果表明,开放标签安慰剂治疗对一些儿童在短期内是可接受且有效的。