• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国骨科医师学会和北美小儿骨科学会网站上患者教育资料的可读性。

Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites.

作者信息

Badarudeen Sameer, Sabharwal Sanjeev

机构信息

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Doctor's Office Center, 90 Bergen Street, Suite 7300, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.G.00347
PMID:18171975
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While experts recommend that the readability of patient education materials should be less than the sixth grade level, the available information pertaining to orthopaedic diseases may be excessively complex for some to read and comprehend. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level is the most widely used tool to evaluate the readability score of a given text, with a lower grade level suggesting easier readability. The goal of our study was to assess the readability of pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials that were developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) and were accessible to the general public through the Internet.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All articles from the "Children" section of the patient education library, "Your Orthopaedic Connection," on the AAOS web site and the "Parent/Patient" section on the POSNA web site were identified. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level of each article was determined with use of Microsoft Office Word software. The mean grade levels of articles that were available in 2001 were compared with those accessible in 2007.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven unique articles were available in 2007 on both web sites compared with twenty-five articles available in 2001. The readability score of only one (2%) of the currently available articles was less than sixth grade level. The mean Flesch-Kincaid grade level of the currently available articles was 8.9 compared with 8.7 for the articles available in 2001 (p = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that most of the pediatric orthopaedic patient education materials available on the AAOS and POSNA web sites have readability scores that may be too high, making comprehension difficult for a substantial portion of the United States population.

摘要

背景

虽然专家建议患者教育材料的可读性应低于六年级水平,但一些有关骨科疾病的现有信息可能过于复杂,难以阅读和理解。弗莱施-金凯德年级水平是评估给定文本可读性分数最广泛使用的工具,年级水平越低表明可读性越容易。我们研究的目的是评估由美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)和北美小儿骨科学会(POSNA)编写的、公众可通过互联网获取的小儿骨科患者教育材料的可读性。

材料与方法

确定了AAOS网站患者教育库“儿童”部分“您的骨科联系”中的所有文章以及POSNA网站“家长/患者”部分中的所有文章。使用Microsoft Office Word软件确定每篇文章的弗莱施-金凯德年级水平。将2001年可用文章的平均年级水平与2007年可获取文章的平均年级水平进行比较。

结果

2007年两个网站上共有57篇独特的文章,而2001年有25篇文章。目前可用的文章中只有一篇(2%)的可读性分数低于六年级水平。目前可用文章的平均弗莱施-金凯德年级水平为8.9,而2001年文章的平均年级水平为8.7(p = 0.71)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,AAOS和POSNA网站上提供的大多数小儿骨科患者教育材料的可读性分数可能过高,使得美国相当一部分人口难以理解。

相似文献

1
Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美小儿骨科学会网站上患者教育资料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00347.
2
Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.脊柱相关患者教育资料的易读性:来自专业组织和脊柱医生网站的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 1;34(25):2826-31. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c.
3
Readability and comprehensibility of patient education material in hand-related web sites.手部相关网站上患者教育材料的可读性和可理解性。
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.04.008. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
4
Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites.美国骨科医师学会和北美关节镜协会网站上有关关节镜相关患者教育资料的可读性。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jun;29(6):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.
5
Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.美国矫形外科医师学会的大多数在线患者教育材料超过了普通患者的阅读水平。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1181-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4071-2. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Readability of online patient education materials from the AAOS web site.美国骨科医师学会网站在线患者教育资料的可读性
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 May;466(5):1245-50. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0193-8. Epub 2008 Mar 7.
7
Quality of online pediatric orthopaedic education materials.在线儿科骨科教育材料的质量。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 3;96(23):e194. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00043.
8
Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.骨科网站上肩部和肘部患者教育材料的可读性比较
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):249-56.
9
The Readability of AAOS Patient Education Materials: Evaluating the Progress Since 2008.美国矫形外科医师学会患者教育材料的可读性:评估自2008年以来的进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Sep 7;98(17):e70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00658.
10
Readability of Patient Educational Materials in Pediatric Orthopaedics.儿科骨科患者教育材料的可读性。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jun 16;103(12):e47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01347.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Accuracy and Readability of ChatGPT in Addressing Patient Queries on Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.评估ChatGPT在解答成人脊柱畸形手术患者问题时的准确性和可读性。
Global Spine J. 2025 Jul 11:21925682251360655. doi: 10.1177/21925682251360655.
2
The role of large language models in improving the readability of orthopaedic spine patient educational material.大语言模型在提高骨科脊柱患者教育材料可读性方面的作用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 28;20(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05955-1.
3
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient Educational Material: An artificial intelligence application.
骨科患者教育材料的可读性:一项人工智能应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 12;64:102971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102971. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Source Characteristics Influence AI-Enabled Orthopaedic Text Simplification: Recommendations for the Future.源特征影响基于人工智能的骨科文本简化:对未来的建议。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 Jan 8;10(1). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00007. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
5
Utilization of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Equitable Healthcare Access for Breast Implant Patients.利用人工智能改善乳房植入患者公平获得医疗服务的情况。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2024 Oct 22;6:ojae093. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojae093. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.
7
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
8
Assessing the readability, reliability, and quality of artificial intelligence chatbot responses to the 100 most searched queries about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An observational study.评估人工智能聊天机器人对心肺复苏术 100 个最常见查询的回答的易读性、可靠性和质量:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 31;103(22):e38352. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038352.
9
An assessment of ChatGPT's responses to frequently asked questions about cervical and breast cancer.评估 ChatGPT 对宫颈癌和乳腺癌常见问题的回答。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Sep 2;24(1):482. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03320-8.
10
Best practices on patient education materials in hip surgery based on learnings from major hip centers and societies.基于主要髋关节中心和学会的经验教训制定的髋关节手术患者教育材料最佳实践。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024 Feb 29;11(2):144-149. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnae011. eCollection 2024 Jul.