Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊医学住院医师的分项评估

Rubric evaluation of pediatric emergency medicine fellows.

作者信息

Hsu Deborah C, Macias Charles G

出版信息

J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Dec;2(4):523-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00083.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a rubric assessment instrument for use by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) faculty to evaluate PEM fellows and for fellows to use to self-assess.

METHODS

This is a prospective study at a PEM fellowship program. The assessment instrument was developed through a multistep process: (1) development of rubric format items, scaled on the modified Dreyfus model proficiency levels, corresponding to the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies; (2) determination of content and construct validity of the items through structured input and item refinement by subject matter experts and focus group review; (3) collection of data using a 61-item form; (4) evaluation of psychometrics; (5) selection of items for use in the final instrument.

RESULTS

A total of 261 evaluations were collected from 2006 to 2007; exploratory factor analysis yielded 5 factors with Eigenvalues >1.0; each contained ≥4 items, with factor loadings >0.4 corresponding with the following competencies: (1) medical knowledge and practice-based learning and improvement, (2) patient care and systems-based practice, (3) interpersonal skills, (4) communication skills, and (5) professionalism. Cronbach α for the final 53-item instrument was 0.989. There was also significant responsiveness of the tool to the year of training.

CONCLUSION

A substantively and statistically validated rubric evaluation of PEM fellows is a reliable tool for formative and summative evaluation.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种评分评估工具,供儿科急诊医学(PEM)教员用于评估PEM研究员,同时供研究员进行自我评估。

方法

这是一项在PEM研究员培训项目中进行的前瞻性研究。评估工具通过多步骤过程开发:(1)开发评分格式项目,根据修改后的德雷福斯模型熟练程度水平进行缩放,对应于研究生医学教育认证委员会的6项核心能力;(2)通过结构化输入以及主题专家和焦点小组审查进行项目细化,确定项目的内容和结构效度;(3)使用一份包含61个条目的表格收集数据;(4)评估心理测量学;(5)选择最终工具中使用的项目。

结果

2006年至2007年共收集了261份评估;探索性因素分析得出5个特征值>1.0的因素;每个因素包含≥4个项目,因素负荷>0.4,对应以下能力:(1)医学知识和基于实践的学习与改进,(2)患者护理和基于系统的实践,(3)人际技能,(4)沟通技能,以及(5)职业素养。最终53个条目的工具的克朗巴赫α系数为0.989。该工具对培训年份也有显著的反应性。

结论

对PEM研究员进行的经过实质和统计验证的评分评估是用于形成性和总结性评估的可靠工具。

相似文献

1
Rubric evaluation of pediatric emergency medicine fellows.
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Dec;2(4):523-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00083.1.
2
Milestone achievements in a national sample of pediatric emergency medicine fellows: impact of primary residency training.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Feb 8;5(3):e10575. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10575. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Design of a point-of-care ultrasound curriculum for pediatric emergency medicine fellows: A Delphi study.
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 1;5(4):e10700. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10700. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
Gender Differences Among Milestone Assessments in a National Sample of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Programs.
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Nov 3;5(3):e10543. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10543. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Teaching the competencies: using objective structured clinical encounters for gastroenterology fellows.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 May;7(5):509-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.10.028. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
6
National Survey of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows on Debriefing After Medical Resuscitations.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):551-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000196.
7
Competency Evaluations in the Next Accreditation System: Contributing to Guidelines and Implications.
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):135-45. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146607.
9
Use of a standardized patient exercise to assess core competencies during fellowship training.
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Mar;2(1):111-7. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-09-00001.1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET).
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Jun;41(6):1229-37. doi: 10.1177/0363546513483535. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The development of a competency-based assessment rubric to measure resident milestones.
J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Sep;1(1):45-8. doi: 10.4300/01.01.0008.
2
The development and psychometric evaluation of a safety climate measure for primary care.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):578-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031062. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
4
Rubrics for clinical evaluation: objectifying the subjective experience.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2009 Mar;9(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2008.10.015. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
5
Scoring rubric for grading students' participation in online discussions.
Comput Inform Nurs. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):26-31; quiz 32-3. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e31818dd3f6.
6
A rubric for improving the quality of online courses.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2008;5:Article 34. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1648. Epub 2008 Sep 5.
7
The use of scoring rubrics to determine clinical performance in the operating suite.
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jan;29(1):73-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
8
Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):58. doi: 10.5688/aj720358.
9
Student perceptions and use of an assessment rubric for a group concept map in physiology.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2008 Mar;32(1):47-54. doi: 10.1152/advan.00030.2007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验