He Yue Ping, Gao Cong Fen, Chen Wen Ming, Huang Li Qin, Zhou Wei Jun, Liu Xu Gan, Shen Jin Liang, Zhu Yu Cheng
Department of Pesticide Science, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agriculture University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Pest Manag Sci. 2008 Mar;64(3):308-15. doi: 10.1002/ps.1522.
Chemical control is a major strategy for suppressing the rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker). Owing to their high toxicity and increasing resistance development in the target insect, many insecticides will be phased out entirely in 2007 in China. Alternatives with relatively low toxicity are urgently needed to replace traditional chemicals for rice stem borer control. In this study, the authors examined four field populations of C. suppressalis for their toxicological responses to more than 20 insecticides, including a few low-toxicity organophosphates and many novel pesticides. Interpopulation resistance levels to 12 conventional insecticides were also compared.
Based on LD(50) values, the rice stem borer was most sensitive to avermectins and fipronil (LD(50) < 1 ng larva(-1)). The stem borers exhibited the least sensitivity to endosulfan (LD(50) > 100 ng larva(-1)) and monosultap (LD(50) > 1000 ng larva(-1)). Insect growth regulators and chitin synthase inhibitors showed great efficacy against C. suppressalis, especially against populations that had developed resistance to conventional insecticides. Four field populations showed variable tolerance levels to many insecticides. LYG05 was the most susceptible population, only with a low level of resistance to monosultap (RR = 6.6). NC05 and GL05 populations exhibited intermediate tolerance levels with RR values up to 20.4 and 52.8 respectively. RA05 was the most resistant population to many insecticides, with resistance ratios up to 76.2.
The results from this study provide valuable information for selection and adoption of new alternative insecticides and for resistance management of the rice stem borer.
化学防治是抑制二化螟(Chilo suppressalis (Walker))的主要策略。由于其高毒性以及目标昆虫中抗性的不断发展,许多杀虫剂将于2007年在中国全面淘汰。迫切需要毒性相对较低的替代品来取代用于防治二化螟的传统化学药剂。在本研究中,作者检测了四个二化螟田间种群对20多种杀虫剂的毒理学反应,其中包括一些低毒有机磷类药剂和许多新型农药。还比较了这些种群对12种常规杀虫剂的种群间抗性水平。
基于半数致死剂量(LD(50))值,二化螟对阿维菌素和氟虫腈最为敏感(LD(50) < 1 ng幼虫(-1))。二化螟对硫丹(LD(50) > 100 ng幼虫(-1))和杀虫单(LD(50) > 1000 ng幼虫(-1))表现出最低敏感性。昆虫生长调节剂和几丁质合成酶抑制剂对二化螟显示出很高的防治效果,尤其是对已对常规杀虫剂产生抗性的种群。四个田间种群对许多杀虫剂表现出不同的耐受水平。LYG05是最敏感的种群,仅对杀虫单有低水平抗性(抗性比RR = 6.6)。NC05和GL05种群表现出中等耐受水平,RR值分别高达20.4和52.8。RA05是对许多杀虫剂抗性最强的种群,抗性比高达76.2。
本研究结果为新替代杀虫剂的选择和应用以及二化螟的抗性治理提供了有价值的信息。