Suppr超能文献

自杀未遂的特征、诊断及未来的自杀未遂情况:比较多次自杀未遂者、单次自杀未遂者及有自杀意念者。

Suicide attempt characteristics, diagnoses, and future attempts: comparing multiple attempters to single attempters and ideators.

作者信息

Miranda Regina, Scott Michelle, Hicks Roger, Wilcox Holly C, Harris Munfakh Jimmie Lou, Shaffer David

机构信息

Dr. Miranda is with the Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York; Drs. Miranda, Scott, and Shaffer, and Mr. Hicks and Ms. Munfakh are with the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Dr. Wilcox is with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Dr. Miranda is with the Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York; Drs. Miranda, Scott, and Shaffer, and Mr. Hicks and Ms. Munfakh are with the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons; Dr. Wilcox is with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;47(1):32-40. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a56cb.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare psychiatric diagnoses and future suicide attempt outcomes of multiple attempters (MAs), single attempters (SAs), and ideators.

METHOD

Two hundred twenty-eight teens who reported recent ideation or a lifetime suicide attempt in a screening of 1,729 high school students completed the Adolescent Suicide Interview, which provided information on attempt number and characteristics and mood, anxiety, and substance use disorder modules of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children; 191 were reinterviewed 4 to 6 years later to ascertain interval attempts and psychiatric disorder. Between screening and follow-up, 33 (17%) teens made an attempt, 12 of whom were previously classified as lifetime MAs (more than one attempt) and six as SAs.

RESULTS

MAs more often met criteria for any one of the DSM diagnoses assessed at baseline (mood, anxiety, or substance use disorder; 71%), compared with SAs (39%) and ideators (41%), and at follow-up (mood, anxiety, substance use, or disruptive behavior disorder; 69%) compared with SAs (36%) (p <.05). As reported at baseline, MAs (versus SAs) more often wished to die during their attempt (53% versus 23%), less often planned their attempt for intervention (44% versus 76%), and more often regretted recovery (26% versus 7%; p <.05). Baseline MAs had significantly higher odds of making a later attempt compared to ideators (odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 1.5-10.2) and SAs (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-20.2). No participants committed suicide during follow-up. SAs who made another attempt (versus those who did not) more often met criteria for a baseline anxiety disorder and more often wished to die during their baseline attempt.

CONCLUSIONS

MAs more strongly predict later suicidality and diagnosis than SAs and ideation. Forms that assess past suicide attempts should routinely inquire about frequency of attempts. The similarity between the present findings and those of clinical samples suggests that screening may yield a representative sample of suicide attempters and ideators.

摘要

目的

比较多次自杀未遂者(MAs)、单次自杀未遂者(SAs)和有自杀意念者的精神疾病诊断及未来自杀未遂结局。

方法

在对1729名高中生进行的筛查中,228名报告近期有自杀意念或有过自杀未遂经历的青少年完成了青少年自杀访谈,该访谈提供了自杀未遂次数及特征以及儿童诊断访谈量表中关于情绪、焦虑和物质使用障碍模块的信息;4至6年后对191名青少年进行了再次访谈,以确定期间的自杀未遂情况和精神疾病。在筛查和随访期间,33名(17%)青少年有过自杀未遂行为,其中12名之前被归类为终身多次自杀未遂者(不止一次自杀未遂),6名被归类为单次自杀未遂者。

结果

与单次自杀未遂者(39%)和有自杀意念者(41%)相比,多次自杀未遂者在基线时(情绪、焦虑或物质使用障碍;71%)更常符合所评估的任何一种《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)诊断标准,在随访时(情绪、焦虑、物质使用或破坏性行为障碍;69%)也比单次自杀未遂者(36%)更常符合诊断标准(p<.05)。如在基线时所报告的那样,多次自杀未遂者(与单次自杀未遂者相比)在自杀未遂期间更常希望死亡(53%对23%),为便于干预而计划自杀未遂的情况较少(44%对76%),对自杀未遂后存活下来更常感到后悔(26%对7%;p<.05)。与有自杀意念者相比,基线时的多次自杀未遂者后期再次自杀未遂的几率显著更高(优势比4.0,95%置信区间1.5 - 10.2),与单次自杀未遂者相比也是如此(优势比4.6,95%置信区间1.0 - 20.2)。随访期间无参与者自杀。再次有过自杀未遂行为的单次自杀未遂者(与未再次自杀未遂者相比)更常符合基线焦虑症的诊断标准,且在基线自杀未遂期间更常希望死亡。

结论

与单次自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者相比,多次自杀未遂者对后期自杀倾向和诊断的预测性更强。评估过去自杀未遂情况的表格应常规询问自杀未遂的频率。本研究结果与临床样本结果的相似性表明,筛查可能会产生具有代表性的自杀未遂者和有自杀意念者样本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验