Suppr超能文献

从童年到青年期注意缺陷多动障碍亚型稳定性的预测因素。

Predictors of stability of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder subtypes from childhood to young adulthood.

作者信息

Todd Richard D, Huang Hongyan, Todorov Alexandre A, Neuman Rosalind J, Reiersen Angela M, Henderson Cynthia A, Reich Wendy C

机构信息

Drs. Todd, Huang, Todorov, Neuman, Reiersen, Henderson, and Reich are with the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine; Dr. Todd is also with the Department of Genetics.

Drs. Todd, Huang, Todorov, Neuman, Reiersen, Henderson, and Reich are with the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine; Dr. Todd is also with the Department of Genetics.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;47(1):76-85. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a6aca.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the 5-year prospective stability of population-based and DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as to explore predictors of stability.

METHOD

A total of 708 twins ages 7 to 19 years who were identified from birth records of the state of Missouri and had participated in a study of ADHD were reassessed 5 years later in a blinded fashion. Stabilities of DSM-IV and population-based ADHD subtypes were compared using percentage of agreement with significance tested by the kappa statistic. Predictors of stability of subtype diagnosis were determined using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

In general, 5-year ADHD subtype stability was poor to modest and ranged from 11.1% to 24.0% for DSM-IV for subtypes and from 14.3% to 35.3% for clinically significant population-derived subtypes. There were no predictors of diagnostic stability that applied across subtypes. There were subtype-specific predictors including a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder for DSM-IV primarily inattentive ADHD; lower verbal IQ for DSM-IV combined type ADHD; and younger age, oppositional defiant disorder, and medication use for population-defined severe combined ADHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Population-defined ADHD subtype criteria demonstrated modestly improved diagnostic stability over 5 years compared to DSM-IV subtypes. Few correlates or predictors of stability were identified.

摘要

目的

确定注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)基于人群和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)亚型的5年预期稳定性,并探索稳定性的预测因素。

方法

从密苏里州的出生记录中确定的708名7至19岁的双胞胎参与了一项ADHD研究,并在5年后以盲法重新评估。使用kappa统计量检验的一致性百分比比较DSM-IV和基于人群的ADHD亚型的稳定性。使用多变量逻辑回归确定亚型诊断稳定性的预测因素。

结果

总体而言,5年ADHD亚型稳定性较差至中等,DSM-IV亚型为11.1%至24.0%,临床上显著的人群衍生亚型为14.3%至35.3%。没有适用于所有亚型的诊断稳定性预测因素。有亚型特异性预测因素,包括DSM-IV主要注意力不集中型ADHD的对立违抗障碍诊断;DSM-IV混合型ADHD的言语智商较低;以及人群定义的重度混合型ADHD的年龄较小、对立违抗障碍和药物使用。

结论

与DSM-IV亚型相比,基于人群定义的ADHD亚型标准在5年中显示出适度改善的诊断稳定性。几乎没有确定稳定性的相关因素或预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验