Todd Richard D, Huang Hongyan, Todorov Alexandre A, Neuman Rosalind J, Reiersen Angela M, Henderson Cynthia A, Reich Wendy C
Drs. Todd, Huang, Todorov, Neuman, Reiersen, Henderson, and Reich are with the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine; Dr. Todd is also with the Department of Genetics.
Drs. Todd, Huang, Todorov, Neuman, Reiersen, Henderson, and Reich are with the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine; Dr. Todd is also with the Department of Genetics.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;47(1):76-85. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31815a6aca.
To determine the 5-year prospective stability of population-based and DSM-IV subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as well as to explore predictors of stability.
A total of 708 twins ages 7 to 19 years who were identified from birth records of the state of Missouri and had participated in a study of ADHD were reassessed 5 years later in a blinded fashion. Stabilities of DSM-IV and population-based ADHD subtypes were compared using percentage of agreement with significance tested by the kappa statistic. Predictors of stability of subtype diagnosis were determined using multivariate logistic regression.
In general, 5-year ADHD subtype stability was poor to modest and ranged from 11.1% to 24.0% for DSM-IV for subtypes and from 14.3% to 35.3% for clinically significant population-derived subtypes. There were no predictors of diagnostic stability that applied across subtypes. There were subtype-specific predictors including a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder for DSM-IV primarily inattentive ADHD; lower verbal IQ for DSM-IV combined type ADHD; and younger age, oppositional defiant disorder, and medication use for population-defined severe combined ADHD.
Population-defined ADHD subtype criteria demonstrated modestly improved diagnostic stability over 5 years compared to DSM-IV subtypes. Few correlates or predictors of stability were identified.
确定注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)基于人群和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)亚型的5年预期稳定性,并探索稳定性的预测因素。
从密苏里州的出生记录中确定的708名7至19岁的双胞胎参与了一项ADHD研究,并在5年后以盲法重新评估。使用kappa统计量检验的一致性百分比比较DSM-IV和基于人群的ADHD亚型的稳定性。使用多变量逻辑回归确定亚型诊断稳定性的预测因素。
总体而言,5年ADHD亚型稳定性较差至中等,DSM-IV亚型为11.1%至24.0%,临床上显著的人群衍生亚型为14.3%至35.3%。没有适用于所有亚型的诊断稳定性预测因素。有亚型特异性预测因素,包括DSM-IV主要注意力不集中型ADHD的对立违抗障碍诊断;DSM-IV混合型ADHD的言语智商较低;以及人群定义的重度混合型ADHD的年龄较小、对立违抗障碍和药物使用。
与DSM-IV亚型相比,基于人群定义的ADHD亚型标准在5年中显示出适度改善的诊断稳定性。几乎没有确定稳定性的相关因素或预测因素。