Suppr超能文献

采用微量免疫荧光和免疫印迹技术检测有确诊感染的患者及健康儿童血清对沙眼衣原体和肺炎衣原体抗原的反应性。

Serum reactivity to Chlamydia trachomatis and C. pneumoniae antigens in patients with documented infection and in healthy children by microimmunofluorescence and immunoblotting techniques.

作者信息

Gonen R, Shemer-Avni Y, Csángó P A, Sarov B, Friedman M G

机构信息

Virology Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

APMIS. 1993 Sep;101(9):719-26.

PMID:8240791
Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis and C. pneumoniae are both important human pathogens. Antigenic cross-reactivity between the two species may complicate serologic diagnosis of infection with one or the other agent. In this study we examined sera of persons with chlamydia infections and of healthy children by microimmunofluorescence (MIF) against C. trachomatis L2 antigen and against C. pneumoniae TW-183 antigen to explore the degree of cross-reactivity found by these two methods. Likewise, the cross-reactivity seen by immunoblot with sera of rabbits immunized against one of the antigens when tested on the other was examined. While among healthy children stratified by age, MIF seropositivity to C. pneumoniae TW-183 increased with age, no such trend was observed with respect to seropositivity to C. trachomatis L2 antigens, and 81% of children seropositive to TW-183 did not react on L2 antigen. Moreover, 27% of those positive on L2 antigen were negative on TW-183. Immunoblot analysis showed much greater antibody cross-reactivity than that detected by MIF. The immunoblot cross-reactivity was probably not attributable solely to double infection since sera of rabbits immunized to only one species of chlamydia reacted strongly with both chlamydiae in immunoblot analysis. The data presented need to be taken into account in the development of serologic tests based on a small number of antigens or on partially denatured antigens.

摘要

沙眼衣原体和肺炎衣原体都是重要的人类病原体。这两种病原体之间的抗原交叉反应可能会使对其中一种病原体感染的血清学诊断变得复杂。在本研究中,我们通过微量免疫荧光法(MIF)检测衣原体感染患者和健康儿童的血清,分别检测其针对沙眼衣原体L2抗原和肺炎衣原体TW-183抗原的反应,以探究这两种方法所发现的交叉反应程度。同样,我们还检测了用一种抗原免疫的兔血清在免疫印迹中对另一种抗原的交叉反应。在按年龄分层的健康儿童中,针对肺炎衣原体TW-183的MIF血清阳性率随年龄增加,而针对沙眼衣原体L2抗原的血清阳性率则未观察到这种趋势,并且81%对TW-183血清阳性的儿童对L2抗原无反应。此外,27%对L2抗原呈阳性的儿童对TW-183呈阴性。免疫印迹分析显示的抗体交叉反应比MIF检测到的要大得多。免疫印迹交叉反应可能不仅仅归因于双重感染,因为仅用一种衣原体免疫的兔血清在免疫印迹分析中与两种衣原体都有强烈反应。在基于少量抗原或部分变性抗原开发血清学检测方法时,需要考虑本文所呈现的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验