Ashendorf Lee, Jefferson Angela L, O'Connor Maureen K, Chaisson Christine, Green Robert C, Stern Robert A
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, United States.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;23(2):129-37. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
The objective of the present study was to provide normative data for Trail Making Test (TMT) time to completion and performance errors among cognitively normal older adults, and to examine TMT error rates in conjunction with time scores for pre-clinical and clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnostic decision-making. A sample of 526 individuals was classified into three diagnostic groups (normal controls, N=269; mild cognitive impairment, MCI, N=200; AD, N=57) by a multidisciplinary consensus conference. Results indicated that performance differed among the three groups for TMT A and B time scores as well as TMT B error rate. Diagnostic classification accuracy (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powers) is described for various combinations of the diagnostic groups. The findings show that TMT B time and errors are independently meaningful scores, and both therefore have clinical utility in assessing individuals referred for dementia evaluations.
本研究的目的是提供认知正常的老年人完成连线测验(TMT)的时间及执行错误的规范数据,并结合临床前和临床阿尔茨海默病(AD)诊断决策的时间分数来检查TMT错误率。通过多学科共识会议,将526名个体的样本分为三个诊断组(正常对照组,N = 269;轻度认知障碍,MCI,N = 200;AD,N = 57)。结果表明,三组在TMT A和B的时间分数以及TMT B错误率方面表现不同。描述了诊断组各种组合的诊断分类准确性(即敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测能力)。研究结果表明,TMT B的时间和错误是独立有意义的分数,因此两者在评估转诊进行痴呆评估的个体时均具有临床实用性。