• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于微阵列的商业可用比较基因组杂交(aCGH)微阵列平台对产后标本进行靶向和全基因组分析的比较。

Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform.

作者信息

Aston E, Whitby H, Maxwell T, Glaus N, Cowley B, Lowry D, Zhu X L, Issa B, South S T, Brothman A R

机构信息

University of Utah CGH Microarray Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 2008 May;45(5):268-74. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.055319. Epub 2008 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1136/jmg.2007.055319
PMID:18178633
Abstract

PURPOSE

The University of Utah Comparative Genomic Hybridization Microarray Laboratory was one of the first US laboratories to offer comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) microarray testing using a commercial platform in a clinical setting. Results for 1076 patients (1598 chips) are presented.

METHODS

The Spectral Genomics/PerkinElmer Constitutional Chip (targeted array), SpectralChip 2600 (whole genome array) and a "Combo" chip (both arrays run simultaneously) were the tests offered. Abnormal results were confirmed by an alternative method, most often fluorescence in situ hybridisation.

RESULTS

In 669 cases with known normal cytogenetics, an abnormal detection rate of 10.8% was observed, (5.3%, 12.2% and 14.1% for the Constitutional Chip, SpectralChip 2600 and Combo assay, respectively). Known copy number variants and single clone abnormalities are not included in these rates. Single clone abnormalities are reported separately. For 1076 total cases, we report an average abnormal rate of 16.9% (8.7%, 23.7% and 18.6% for the three assays). This rate includes characterisation of some abnormalities previously identified by cytogenetics.

CONCLUSIONS

CGH microarray provides a likely aetiology for the clinical phenotype in many cytogenetically normal cases, and a whole genome array generally identifies copy number changes more effectively than a targeted chip alone.

摘要

目的

犹他大学比较基因组杂交微阵列实验室是美国首批在临床环境中使用商业平台提供比较基因组杂交(CGH)微阵列检测的实验室之一。本文展示了1076例患者(1598张芯片)的检测结果。

方法

提供的检测包括Spectral Genomics/PerkinElmer结构芯片(靶向阵列)、SpectralChip 2600(全基因组阵列)以及“组合”芯片(同时运行两种阵列)。异常结果通过另一种方法进行确认,最常用的是荧光原位杂交。

结果

在669例已知细胞遗传学正常的病例中,异常检测率为10.8%(结构芯片、SpectralChip 2600和组合检测的异常率分别为5.3%、12.2%和14.1%)。这些比率不包括已知的拷贝数变异和单克隆异常。单克隆异常单独报告。对于1076例总病例,我们报告的平均异常率为16.9%(三种检测的异常率分别为8.7%、23.7%和18.6%)。该比率包括对一些先前通过细胞遗传学鉴定的异常的特征描述。

结论

CGH微阵列在许多细胞遗传学正常的病例中为临床表型提供了可能的病因,并且全基因组阵列通常比单独的靶向芯片更有效地识别拷贝数变化。

相似文献

1
Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform.使用基于微阵列的商业可用比较基因组杂交(aCGH)微阵列平台对产后标本进行靶向和全基因组分析的比较。
J Med Genet. 2008 May;45(5):268-74. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2007.055319. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
2
Validation of the Agilent 244K oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization platform for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis.基于安捷伦244K寡核苷酸阵列的比较基因组杂交平台用于临床细胞遗传学诊断的验证
Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Sep;132(3):349-60. doi: 10.1309/AJCP1BOUTWF6ERYS.
3
Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations.采用基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交技术检测多发畸形胎儿的基因组失衡情况。
J Med Genet. 2005 Feb;42(2):121-8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.025478.
4
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and its applications in human genetics.基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交及其在人类遗传学中的应用。
Clin Genet. 2004 Dec;66(6):488-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00322.x.
5
Targeted genomic microarray analysis for identification of chromosome abnormalities in 1500 consecutive clinical cases.采用靶向基因组微阵列分析技术对1500例连续临床病例进行染色体异常鉴定。
J Pediatr. 2006 Jul;149(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.02.006.
6
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization in clinical diagnosis.基于芯片的比较基因组杂交技术在临床诊断中的应用
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005 May;5(3):421-9. doi: 10.1586/14737159.5.3.421.
7
Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray.与靶向微阵列相比,产前标本的全基因组微阵列分析可识别具有临床意义的染色体改变,而不会增加结果的不明意义。
Prenat Diagn. 2009 Dec;29(12):1156-66. doi: 10.1002/pd.2371.
8
Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens.基于微阵列的产前和新生儿样本细胞遗传学异常检测率比较。
Prenat Diagn. 2008 Sep;28(9):789-95. doi: 10.1002/pd.2053.
9
Copy number variations associated with idiopathic autism identified by whole-genome microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization.通过基于全基因组微阵列的比较基因组杂交鉴定出的与特发性自闭症相关的拷贝数变异。
Psychiatr Genet. 2009 Aug;19(4):177-85. doi: 10.1097/YPG.0b013e32832bdafa.
10
[Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization in the study of constitutional chromosomal abnormalities].基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交技术在先天性染色体异常研究中的应用
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2007 Feb;55(1):13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis in Children with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability.发育迟缓/智力残疾儿童的基于阵列的比较基因组杂交分析
Balkan J Med Genet. 2022 Jun 5;24(2):15-24. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2021-0020. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Chromosomal Microarray in Children With Developmental Delay: The Experience of a Tertiary Center in Korea.发育迟缓儿童的染色体微阵列分析:韩国一家三级中心的经验
Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 15;9:690493. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.690493. eCollection 2021.
3
Sequence characteristics define trade-offs between on-target and genome-wide off-target hybridization of oligoprobes.
序列特征决定了寡探针与靶标和全基因组非靶标杂交之间的权衡。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199162. eCollection 2018.
4
Microarray experiments and factors which affect their reliability.微阵列实验及其影响可靠性的因素。
Biol Direct. 2015 Sep 3;10:46. doi: 10.1186/s13062-015-0077-2.
5
An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies.超声检测胎儿异常的产前细胞遗传学技术的经济学分析
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 May;164A(5):1192-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36435. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
6
Comparison of genome-wide array genomic hybridization platforms for the detection of copy number variants in idiopathic mental retardation.比较基因组范围的阵列基因组杂交平台在特发性智力障碍的拷贝数变异检测中的应用。
BMC Med Genomics. 2011 Mar 25;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-4-25.
7
Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.微阵列分析在产前诊断中的应用进展。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;23(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834457c7.
8
Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.共识声明:对于患有发育障碍或先天畸形的个体,染色体微阵列是一线临床诊断测试。
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 May 14;86(5):749-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.04.006.
9
Evaluation of LOINC for representing constitutional cytogenetic test result reports.评估逻辑观察标识符名称和编码系统(LOINC)在表示染色体组细胞遗传学检测结果报告方面的情况。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:239-43.
10
Detection of pathogenic copy number variants in children with idiopathic intellectual disability using 500 K SNP array genomic hybridization.采用 500 K SNP 阵列基因组杂交技术检测特发性智力障碍儿童的致病性拷贝数变异。
BMC Genomics. 2009 Nov 16;10:526. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-526.