Dacks Joel B, Walker Giselle, Field Mark C
The Molteno Building, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
Parasitol Int. 2008 Jun;57(2):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2007.11.004. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
An accurate understanding of evolutionary relationships is central in biology. For parasitologists, understanding the relationships among eukaryotic organisms allows the prediction of virulence mechanisms, reconstruction of metabolic pathways, identification of potential drug targets, elucidation of parasite-specific cellular processes and understanding of interactions with the host or vector. Here we consider the impact of major recent revisions of eukaryotic systematics and taxonomy on parasitology. The previous, ladder-like model placed some protists as early diverging, with the remaining eukaryotes "progressing" towards a "crown radiation" of animals, plants, Fungi and some additional protistan lineages. This model has been robustly disproven. The new model is based on vastly increased amounts of molecular sequence data, integration with morphological information and the rigorous application of phylogenetic methods to those data. It now divides eukaryotes into six major supergroups; the relationships between those groups and the order of branching remain unknown. This new eukaryotic phylogeny emphasizes that organisms including Giardia, Trypanosoma and Trichomonas are not primitive, but instead highly evolved and specialised for their specific environments. The wealth of newly available comparative genomic data has also allowed the reconstruction of ancient suites of characteristics and mapping of character evolution in diverse parasites. For example, the last common eukaryotic ancestor was apparently complex, suggesting that lineage-specific adaptations and secondary losses have been important in the evolution of protistan parasites. Referring to the best evidence-based models for eukaryotic evolution will allow parasitologists to make more accurate and reliable inferences about pathogens that cause significant morbidity and mortality.
准确理解进化关系是生物学的核心。对于寄生虫学家而言,了解真核生物之间的关系有助于预测毒力机制、重建代谢途径、识别潜在药物靶点、阐明寄生虫特有的细胞过程以及理解与宿主或媒介的相互作用。在此,我们探讨近期真核生物系统学和分类学的重大修订对寄生虫学的影响。先前的阶梯状模型将一些原生生物置于早期分化位置,其余真核生物朝着动物、植物、真菌和一些其他原生生物谱系的“冠群辐射”“进化”。这一模型已被有力地推翻。新模型基于大量增加的分子序列数据、与形态学信息的整合以及对这些数据严格应用系统发育方法。现在它将真核生物分为六个主要超群;这些群体之间的关系以及分支顺序仍不明晰。这种新的真核生物系统发育强调,包括贾第虫、锥虫和滴虫在内的生物并非原始生物,而是高度进化且适应其特定环境的特化生物。大量新可得的比较基因组数据也使得能够重建古代特征组,并绘制不同寄生虫中特征进化的图谱。例如,最后的真核共同祖先显然是复杂的,这表明谱系特异性适应和次生损失在原生生物寄生虫的进化中很重要。参考基于最佳证据的真核生物进化模型将使寄生虫学家能够对导致重大发病率和死亡率的病原体做出更准确可靠的推断。