Hamano Hikaru, Maeda Naoyuki, Hamano Takashi, Mitsunaga Sachiko, Kotani Setsuko
Hamano Eye Clinic, Osaka, Japan.
Eye Contact Lens. 2008 Jan;34(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e318073cf5d.
The physiologic effects on the cornea of dozing while wearing contact lenses were assessed by using central corneal swelling as an index in relation with lens oxygen transmissibility (Dk/t).
Two hydrogel lens materials (nelfilcon A and etafilcon A) with a power of -0.50 diopters (D) and three silicone hydrogel lens materials (galyfilcon A, senofilcon A, and lotrafilcon A) with a power of -0.50 D were studied on 16 eyes of eight subjects with no previous experience of contact lens wear and no ocular disease. The subjects wore the lenses for seven continuous hours with their eyelids closed for 1 hour after the first 3 hours of lens wear to simulate a dozing condition. Corneal thickness was measured with a specular microscope with a built-in pachometer (Topcon SP-2000P). The same measurement was performed for the non-lens-wearing eyes as the control.
Swelling rates immediately after dozing were 4.8%+/-1.4% for nelfilcon A, 5.2%+/-1.7% for etafilcon A, 2.8%+/-1.2% for galyfilcon A, 1.9%+/-0.8% for senofilcon A, and 1.5%+/-1.6% for lotrafilcon A. The swelling rates for the two hydrogel lenses were significantly higher (P<0.001) than that for the control (1.8%+/-1.5%), and the differences remained significant after 3 hours. Conversely, none of the three silicone hydrogel lenses showed a significant difference (P>0.05) compared to the control at any measurement.
The results indicate that dozing with silicone hydrogel lens wear causes clearly fewer intense physiologic effects in oxygen performance than dozing with hydrogel lens wear.
以中央角膜肿胀为指标,评估佩戴隐形眼镜时打瞌睡对角膜的生理影响,并研究其与镜片透氧性(Dk/t)的关系。
对8名无隐形眼镜佩戴史且无眼部疾病的受试者的16只眼睛进行研究,使用两种屈光度为-0.50的水凝胶镜片材料(奈非康A和依他康A)和三种屈光度为-0.50的硅水凝胶镜片材料(加雷康A、森诺康A和洛他康A)。受试者连续佩戴镜片7小时,在佩戴镜片3小时后闭眼1小时以模拟打瞌睡状态。使用内置测厚仪的镜面显微镜(Topcon SP - 2000P)测量角膜厚度。对未佩戴镜片的眼睛进行相同测量作为对照。
打瞌睡后,奈非康A的肿胀率为4.8%±1.4%,依他康A为5.2%±1.7%,加雷康A为2.8%±1.2%,森诺康A为1.9%±0.8%,洛他康A为1.5%±1.6%。两种水凝胶镜片的肿胀率显著高于对照组(1.8%±1.5%,P<0.001),且3小时后差异仍显著。相反,三种硅水凝胶镜片在任何测量中与对照组相比均无显著差异(P>0.05)。
结果表明,佩戴硅水凝胶镜片打瞌睡在氧气性能方面引起的强烈生理影响明显少于佩戴水凝胶镜片打瞌睡。