Suppr超能文献

解释长期病假的社会梯度:一项针对丹麦员工的前瞻性研究。

Explaining the social gradient in long-term sickness absence: a prospective study of Danish employees.

作者信息

Christensen Karl Bang, Labriola Merete, Lund Thomas, Kivimäki Mika

机构信息

National Institute of Occupational Health, Denmark.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Feb;62(2):181-3. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.056135.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify differences in risk of sickness absence between socioeconomic groups, and to examine to what extent these differences can be explained by health behaviour and work environment factors.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 5221 employees in Denmark interviewed in 2000 regarding health behaviours and work environment were followed for 18 months in order to assess their rate of sickness absence exceeding eight consecutive weeks. Based on employment grade, job title and education respondents were classified into five socioeconomic position (SEP) groups. Executive managers and academics were the reference group.

RESULTS

For both genders a social gradient in long-term sickness absence rates was evident. In men, controlling for health behaviours and physical work environment factors reduced rate ratios by 22-57%. Controlling for health behaviours alone reduced rate ratios by 6-13%. In women, controlling for health behaviour reduced rate ratios by 5-18%, and controlling for both health behaviours and physical work environment factors reduced rate ratios by 21-44%. Introducing psychosocial factors reduced the rate ratios further, yielding a reduction of 22-53% in the fully adjusted model. In both genders, the largest reductions were seen in skilled blue-collar workers and for semi-skilled or unskilled workers (by 58-59% in men and by 41-53% in women).

CONCLUSION

A social gradient in long-term sickness absence was found. Physical work environment explained more of this gradient than health behaviour. Also including psychosocial work environment in the model had no effect in men but a small effect among women.

摘要

目的

确定社会经济群体之间病假风险的差异,并研究这些差异在多大程度上可由健康行为和工作环境因素来解释。

设计、背景和参与者:对丹麦的5221名员工进行了队列研究,于2000年对他们的健康行为和工作环境进行了访谈,并对其进行了18个月的跟踪,以评估他们连续八周以上的病假率。根据就业等级、职位头衔和教育程度,将受访者分为五个社会经济地位(SEP)组。执行经理和学者为参照组。

结果

无论男性还是女性,长期病假率都存在社会梯度差异。对于男性,在控制健康行为和体力工作环境因素后,比率降低了22%-57%。仅控制健康行为,比率降低了6%-13%。对于女性,控制健康行为后比率降低了5%-18%,同时控制健康行为和体力工作环境因素后比率降低了21%-44%。引入社会心理因素后,比率进一步降低,在完全调整模型中降低了22%-53%。无论男性还是女性,熟练蓝领工人以及半熟练或非熟练工人的降幅最大(男性为58%-59%,女性为41%-53%)。

结论

发现长期病假存在社会梯度差异。体力工作环境比健康行为能更多地解释这种梯度差异。在模型中纳入社会心理工作环境对男性没有影响,但对女性有较小影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验