Suppr超能文献

日本废水处理过程中66种药物的去除效率。

Removal efficiency of 66 pharmaceuticals during wastewater treatment process in Japan.

作者信息

Okuda T, Kobayashi Y, Nagao R, Yamashita N, Tanaka H, Tanaka S, Fujii S, Konishi C, Houwa I

机构信息

Research Center for Environmental Quality Management, Kyoto University Graduate School of Engineering, 1-2 Yumihama, Otsu City, Shiga 520-0811, Japan.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2008;57(1):65-71. doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.822.

Abstract

Both biological treatment processes including conventional activated sludge (CAS) and biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes, and physico-chemical treatment processes including ozonation process and Title 22 process consisting of coagulation, sedimentation and filtration followed by UV or chlorination disinfection after the above biological processes, were compared from the viewpoint of removal efficiency. 66 pharmaceuticals including antibiotics, analgesics, psychoneurotic agents were measured with SPE-LC/MS/MS. 26 compounds out of 66 were detected in the influent ranging ng/L to microg/L order. Particularly, disopyramide, sulpiride, and dipyridamole that have been rarely detected before in the WWTP, occurred at concentration levels of more than 100 ng/L. The total concentration of the individual pharmaceuticals in the influent was efficiently removed by 80% during the biological treatment. But removal efficiencies of carbamazepine and crotamiton were less than 30%. The total concentration of the individual pharmaceuticals in the effluent from CAS process was 1.5 times higher than that from BNR process. Further, the total concentration of the individual pharmaceuticals in the discharge from WWTPs applying ozonation following activated sludge process was reduced to less than 20%. Physico-chemical treatment train called Title 22 treatment after CAS could not efficiently remove the pharmaceuticals. However, ozonation process followed by biological activated carbon process could efficiently reduce all the residual pharmaceuticals below their quantification limits.

摘要

从去除效率的角度,对包括传统活性污泥法(CAS)和生物脱氮除磷(BNR)工艺在内的生物处理工艺,以及包括臭氧化工艺和22号标准工艺(该工艺由混凝、沉淀、过滤组成,在上述生物处理工艺之后进行紫外线或氯化消毒)在内的物理化学处理工艺进行了比较。使用固相萃取-液相色谱/串联质谱法对66种药物进行了测定,这些药物包括抗生素、镇痛药、精神神经药物。在进水口检测到66种化合物中的26种,浓度范围为纳克/升至微克/升。特别是,在污水处理厂以前很少检测到的丙吡胺、舒必利和双嘧达莫,其浓度水平超过100纳克/升。在生物处理过程中,进水口单个药物的总浓度被有效去除了80%。但是卡马西平和克罗米通的去除效率低于30%。CAS工艺出水单个药物的总浓度比BNR工艺高出1.5倍。此外,在活性污泥工艺之后采用臭氧化处理的污水处理厂排放物中单个药物的总浓度降低到了20%以下。在CAS之后称为22号标准处理的物理化学处理流程不能有效地去除这些药物。然而,臭氧化工艺之后接生物活性炭工艺可以有效地将所有残留药物降低到其定量限以下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验