• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

圈养和野生健康板鳃亚纲鱼类的血培养结果。

Blood culture results from healthy captive and free-ranging elasmobranchs.

作者信息

Mylniczenko Natalie D, Harris Brigita, Wilborn Rachel E, Young Forrest A

机构信息

John G. Shedd Aquarium, 1200 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, USA.

出版信息

J Aquat Anim Health. 2007 Sep;19(3):159-67. doi: 10.1577/H06-039.1.

DOI:10.1577/H06-039.1
PMID:18201057
Abstract

Blood culture is a diagnostic tool used in confirming bacterial disease in teleostean and elasmobranch fishes. Unlike teleosts, elasmobranchs have a normal microflora in multiple organs, but their blood has generally been considered to be sterile. In regular exams of elasmobranchs conducted at a public aquarium, occasional blood samples have tested positive on culture. This finding prompted a blood culture survey of healthy captive and wild elasmobranchs (sharks and stingrays), which showed that 26.7% of all animals were positive. Stingrays alone showed a 50% occurrence of positive blood cultures, although the total number of animals was low and freshwater species were included in this number. When elasmobranchs other than stingrays were evaluated according to metabolic category, pelagic animals had a higher percentage of positive cultures than nonpelagic animals (38.7% versus 13.9%). These results indicate that a single positive blood culture without other corroborating diagnostics is not sufficient to confirm septicemia in elasmobranchs.

摘要

血液培养是一种用于确诊硬骨鱼和软骨鱼细菌性疾病的诊断工具。与硬骨鱼不同,软骨鱼多个器官中存在正常微生物群,但一般认为它们的血液是无菌的。在一家公共水族馆对软骨鱼进行的常规检查中,偶尔有血液样本培养检测呈阳性。这一发现促使对健康的圈养和野生软骨鱼(鲨鱼和黄貂鱼)进行血液培养调查,结果显示所有动物中有26.7%呈阳性。仅黄貂鱼的血液培养阳性率就达50%,不过动物总数较少,且这一数字中包括淡水种类。当根据代谢类别对黄貂鱼以外的软骨鱼进行评估时,远洋动物的培养阳性率高于非远洋动物(38.7%对13.9%)。这些结果表明,在没有其他确证诊断的情况下,单次血液培养阳性不足以确诊软骨鱼败血症。

相似文献

1
Blood culture results from healthy captive and free-ranging elasmobranchs.圈养和野生健康板鳃亚纲鱼类的血培养结果。
J Aquat Anim Health. 2007 Sep;19(3):159-67. doi: 10.1577/H06-039.1.
2
Evaluation of critical care blood analytes assessed with a point-of-care portable blood analyzer in wild and aquarium-housed elasmobranchs and the influence of phlebotomy site on results.使用即时检测便携式血液分析仪对野生和饲养在水族箱中的软骨鱼类进行重症监护血液分析物评估以及采血部位对结果的影响。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2012 Jul 1;241(1):117-25. doi: 10.2460/javma.241.1.117.
3
Metabolic organization of freshwater, euryhaline, and marine elasmobranchs: implications for the evolution of energy metabolism in sharks and rays.淡水、广盐性和海洋软骨鱼类的代谢组织:对鲨鱼和鳐鱼能量代谢进化的影响。
J Exp Biol. 2006 Jul;209(Pt 13):2495-508. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02294.
4
Case series: Lymphoid neoplasia in three elasmobranch species.病例系列:三种软骨鱼类的淋巴组织肿瘤
J Fish Dis. 2023 Mar;46(3):273-279. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13742. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Ultrasonographic and hormonal characterization of reproductive health and disease in wild, semiwild, and aquarium-housed southern stingrays ().野生、半野生及饲养于水族箱中的南方黄貂鱼生殖健康与疾病的超声及激素特征分析()
Am J Vet Res. 2019 Oct;80(10):931-942. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.80.10.931.
6
Are concentrations of pollutants in sharks, rays and skates (Elasmobranchii) a cause for concern? A systematic review.鲨鱼、鳐鱼和𫚉鱼(软骨鱼纲)体内的污染物浓度是否令人担忧?一项系统评价。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2020 Nov;160:111701. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111701. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Low mass-specific brain Na+/K+-ATPase activity in elasmobranch compared to teleost fishes: implications for the large brain size of elasmobranchs.与硬骨鱼相比,软骨鱼的脑钠钾ATP酶比活性较低:对软骨鱼大脑体积较大的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 7;267(1450):1335-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1147.
8
Comparative transcriptomics of elasmobranchs and teleosts highlight important processes in adaptive immunity and regional endothermy.软骨鱼和硬骨鱼的比较转录组学突出了适应性免疫和区域性体温调节中的重要过程。
BMC Genomics. 2017 Jan 30;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-3411-x.
9
Hematology and blood biochemistry profile of the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon magdalenae as a tool for population assessment in artificial environments.淡水黄貂鱼 Potamotrygon magdalenae 的血液学和血液生化学特征可作为人工环境中种群评估的工具。
Braz J Biol. 2021 Mar 29;82:e233780. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.233780. eCollection 2021.
10
The sea louse Lepeophtheirus acutus (Caligidae, Siphonostomatoida, Copepoda) as a pathogen of aquarium-held elasmobranchs.海虱 Lepeophtheirus acutus(Caligidae,Siphonostomatoida,桡足纲)作为水族馆养殖的软骨鱼类的病原体。
J Fish Dis. 2011 Oct;34(10):793-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2011.01295.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathology of stranded blue sharks (Prionace glauca) impaled by swordfish (Xiphias gladius).被旗鱼(剑鱼属)刺穿的搁浅蓝鲨(大青鲨)的病理学研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 12;15(1):29546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13617-9.
2
Case report: Endolymphatic system disease in elasmobranchs: clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment strategies.病例报告:板鳃亚纲动物的内淋巴系统疾病:临床表现、诊断及治疗策略
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Mar 10;11:1463428. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1463428. eCollection 2024.
3
Elasmobranch-associated microbiota: a scientometric literature review.
鲨鱼相关微生物组:文献计量学综述。
PeerJ. 2022 Nov 2;10:e14255. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14255. eCollection 2022.
4
Microbiome differences between wild and aquarium whitespotted eagle rays (Aetobatus narinari).野生与水族箱中的白点鹰鲼(Aetobatus narinari)之间的微生物组差异
Anim Microbiome. 2022 May 23;4(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00187-8.
5
Elasmobranch microbiomes: emerging patterns and implications for host health and ecology.软骨鱼类微生物群:新出现的模式及其对宿主健康和生态的影响
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Sep 15;3(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00121-4.
6
Microbiota of wild-caught Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus.野生捕获的红鲷(Lutjanus campechanus)的微生物群。
BMC Microbiol. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0864-7.
7
Widespread Natural Occurrence of Hydroxyurea in Animals.羟基脲在动物中的广泛自然存在。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0142890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142890. eCollection 2015.
8
Emergence of the acute-phase protein hemopexin in jawed vertebrates.有颌脊椎动物急性期蛋白血影蛋白的出现。
Mol Immunol. 2010 Nov-Dec;48(1-3):147-52. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Sep 29.