Suppr超能文献

野生与水族箱中的白点鹰鲼(Aetobatus narinari)之间的微生物组差异

Microbiome differences between wild and aquarium whitespotted eagle rays (Aetobatus narinari).

作者信息

Clavere-Graciette Ana G, McWhirt Mary E, Hoopes Lisa A, Bassos-Hull Kim, Wilkinson Krystan A, Stewart Frank J, Pratte Zoe A

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Research and Conservation, Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Anim Microbiome. 2022 May 23;4(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00187-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Animal-associated microbiomes can be influenced by both host and environmental factors. Comparing wild animals to those in zoos or aquariums can help disentangle the effects of host versus environmental factors, while also testing whether managed conditions foster a 'natural' host microbiome. Focusing on an endangered elasmobranch species-the whitespotted eagle ray Aetobatus narinari-we compared the skin, gill, and cloaca microbiomes of wild individuals to those at Georgia Aquarium. Whitespotted eagle ray microbiomes from Georgia Aquarium were also compared to those of cownose rays (Rhinoptera bonasus) in the same exhibit, allowing us to explore the effect of host identity on the ray microbiome.

RESULTS

Long-term veterinary monitoring indicated that the rays in managed care did not have a history of disease and maintained health parameters consistent with those of wild individuals, with one exception. Aquarium whitespotted eagle rays were regularly treated to control parasite loads, but the effects on animal health were subclinical. Microbiome α- and β-diversity differed between wild versus aquarium whitespotted eagle rays at all body sites, with α-diversity significantly higher in wild individuals. β-diversity differences in wild versus aquarium whitespotted eagle rays were greater for skin and gill microbiomes compared to those of the cloaca. At each body site, we also detected microbial taxa shared between wild and aquarium eagle rays. Additionally, the cloaca, skin, and gill microbiomes of aquarium eagle rays differed from those of cownose rays in the same exhibit. Potentially pathogenic bacteria were at low abundance in all wild and aquarium rays.

CONCLUSION

For whitespotted eagle rays, managed care was associated with a microbiome differing significantly from that of wild individuals. These differences were not absolute, as the microbiome of aquarium rays shared members with that of wild counterparts and was distinct from that of a cohabitating ray species. Eagle rays under managed care appear healthy, suggesting that their microbiomes are not associated with compromised host health. However, the ray microbiome is dynamic, differing with both environmental factors and host identity. Monitoring of aquarium ray microbiomes over time may identify taxonomic patterns that co-vary with host health.

摘要

背景

与动物相关的微生物群会受到宿主和环境因素的影响。将野生动物与动物园或水族馆中的动物进行比较,有助于厘清宿主因素与环境因素的影响,同时也能检验人工饲养条件是否能培育出“自然的”宿主微生物群。以一种濒危的板鳃亚纲物种——白点鹰魟(Aetobatus narinari)为例,我们比较了野生个体与佐治亚水族馆中个体的皮肤、鳃和泄殖腔微生物群。我们还将佐治亚水族馆中白点鹰魟的微生物群与同一展区中的牛鼻鲼(Rhinoptera bonasus)的微生物群进行了比较,以便探究宿主身份对魟类微生物群的影响。

结果

长期的兽医监测表明,人工饲养的魟类没有疾病史,其健康参数与野生个体一致,但有一个例外。水族馆中的白点鹰魟会定期接受治疗以控制寄生虫数量,不过对动物健康的影响处于亚临床水平。野生与水族馆中的白点鹰魟在所有身体部位的微生物群α多样性和β多样性均存在差异,野生个体的α多样性显著更高。与泄殖腔相比,野生与水族馆中的白点鹰魟在皮肤和鳃微生物群的β多样性差异更大。在每个身体部位,我们还检测到野生与水族馆鹰魟共有的微生物分类群。此外,水族馆鹰魟的泄殖腔、皮肤和鳃微生物群与同一展区中的牛鼻鲼不同。所有野生和水族馆魟类中潜在致病细菌的丰度都很低。

结论

对于白点鹰魟而言,人工饲养与一个与野生个体显著不同的微生物群有关。这些差异并非绝对,因为水族馆魟类的微生物群与野生同类有共同的成员,且与同处一个展区的其他魟类物种不同。人工饲养下的鹰魟看起来健康,这表明它们的微生物群与宿主健康受损无关。然而,魟类微生物群是动态变化的,会因环境因素和宿主身份而有所不同。对水族馆魟类微生物群进行长期监测可能会发现与宿主健康共同变化的分类模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/68eb/9128078/fec43e9bfd5e/42523_2022_187_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验