Ricci Giuseppe, Perticarari Sandra, Boscolo Rita, Montico Marcella, Guaschino Secondo, Presani Gianni
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Fertil Steril. 2009 Feb;91(2):632-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.068. Epub 2008 Jan 18.
To compare the effects of density-gradient centrifugation and swim-up on sperm apoptosis by using a multiparameter flow cytometric method.
Autocontrolled split-sample study.
Tertiary infertility center.
PATIENT(S): Sixty-two male partners of couples undergoing infertility investigations.
INTERVENTION(S): Each sample was analyzed both before and after semen preparation by optical microscopy and by flow cytometry.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Percentage of viable, apoptotic, and necrotic sperm and recovery rate of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm before and after the two sperm preparation methods.
RESULT(S): Compared with the original semen, the mean percentages of apoptotic and necrotic sperm were significantly lower after both sperm preparation methods. The mean percentage of viable sperm was significantly higher after swim-up compared with gradient centrifugation. The recovery rates of total motile, progressive motile, and viable sperm were significantly higher using gradient centrifugation compared with swim-up. The viable sperm percentage and the progressive sperm motility were significant predictors for negative difference between the two methods in terms of viable sperm percentage after preparation.
CONCLUSION(S): Both sperm preparation methods allow obtaining a sperm population with a low percentage of apoptotic sperm. Therefore, the risk of using apoptotic sperm for clinical treatment seems to be rather low. The choice of method will depend on whether IVF/ICSI or intrauterine insemination is to be performed.
采用多参数流式细胞术比较密度梯度离心法和上游法对精子凋亡的影响。
自身对照的分割样本研究。
三级不孕不育中心。
62对接受不孕不育检查夫妇的男性伴侣。
每个样本在精液处理前后均通过光学显微镜和流式细胞术进行分析。
两种精子处理方法前后活精子、凋亡精子和坏死精子的百分比,以及总活动精子、前向运动精子和活精子的回收率。
与原始精液相比,两种精子处理方法后凋亡精子和坏死精子的平均百分比均显著降低。与梯度离心法相比,上游法后活精子的平均百分比显著更高。与上游法相比,梯度离心法的总活动精子、前向运动精子和活精子的回收率显著更高。活精子百分比和前向精子活力是两种方法处理后活精子百分比负差异的显著预测因素。
两种精子处理方法均能获得凋亡精子百分比低的精子群体。因此,临床治疗使用凋亡精子的风险似乎相当低。方法的选择将取决于是否进行体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射或宫腔内人工授精。