Hoffman Matthew R, Baggott Christopher D, Jiang Jack
Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
J Voice. 2009 Mar;23(2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.09.005. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
Measuring subglottal pressure (P(s)) with complete interruption can be problematic due to unsteady plateaus in supraglottal pressure data traces during balloon valve interruption. Subjectively determining when the graph plateaus neglect the effects of laryngeal, auditory, and other physical reflexes may alter patient effort and glottal configuration. If the P(s) estimation was made at a consistent time before the onset of reflexes, the recorded pressure would not be dependent on subjective analysis by a clinician, and intrasubject data would be more precise. Previously collected data using the airflow interruption system have shown consistency at approximately 150 milliseconds after balloon valve inflation. To evaluate the validity of estimating P(s) at this point, a theoretical and a physical model were applied. A theoretical ideal gas model of capacitance calculated the time necessary for supraglottal pressure to equilibrate with P(s). Using a mechanical pseudolung which served as a constant pressure source, known subresistor pressures were compared to the pressure measured by the interruption device. Both models confirmed the validity of measuring P(s) consistently at 150 milliseconds into the 500-millisecond interruption. In human trials testing 25 subjects, mean intrasubject standard deviation using this optimal time constant was 0.66+/-0.37cm H(2)O, and 1.11+/-0.48cm H(2)O when performing plateau analysis (P<0.0005). This novel modification to the clinically feasible interruption model for P(s) estimation demonstrates a marked improvement in the reliability of balloon valve interruption while maintaining the validity demonstrated in previous studies.
在球囊瓣膜中断期间,由于声门上压力数据轨迹存在不稳定的平台期,完全中断测量声门下压力(P(s))可能会出现问题。主观判断图表何时达到平台期会忽略喉部、听觉和其他生理反射的影响,这可能会改变患者的用力程度和声门配置。如果在反射开始前的一致时间进行P(s)估计,记录的压力将不依赖于临床医生的主观分析,并且个体内数据会更精确。先前使用气流中断系统收集的数据表明,在球囊瓣膜充气后约150毫秒时具有一致性。为了评估此时估计P(s)的有效性,应用了一个理论模型和一个物理模型。电容的理论理想气体模型计算了声门上压力与P(s)平衡所需的时间。使用作为恒压源的机械假肺,将已知的亚电阻器压力与中断装置测量的压力进行比较。两个模型均证实了在500毫秒中断过程中150毫秒时一致测量P(s)的有效性。在对25名受试者进行的人体试验中,使用此最佳时间常数时个体内平均标准差为0.66±0.37cm H₂O,而进行平台期分析时为1.11±0.48cm H₂O(P<0.0005)。这种对临床上可行的用于P(s)估计的中断模型的新颖改进表明,在保持先前研究中所证明的有效性的同时,球囊瓣膜中断的可靠性有了显著提高。