Suppr超能文献

利用新型听觉 Stroop 任务评估注意倾听的神经基础。

Neural substrates of attentive listening assessed with a novel auditory Stroop task.

机构信息

Laboratory for Brain Imaging of Language, Attention and Memory, Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona Tucson, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Jan 4;4:236. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00236. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

A common explanation for the interference effect in the classic visual Stroop test is that reading a word (the more automatic semantic response) must be suppressed in favor of naming the text color (the slower sensory response). Neuroimaging studies also consistently report anterior cingulate/medial frontal, lateral prefrontal, and anterior insular structures as key components of a network for Stroop-conflict processing. It remains unclear, however, whether automatic processing of semantic information can explain the interference effect in other variants of the Stroop test. It also is not known if these frontal regions serve a specific role in visual Stroop conflict, or instead play a more universal role as components of a more generalized, supramodal executive-control network for conflict processing. To address these questions, we developed a novel auditory Stroop test in which the relative dominance of semantic and sensory feature processing is reversed. Listeners were asked to focus either on voice gender (a more automatic sensory discrimination task) or on the gender meaning of the word (a less automatic semantic task) while ignoring the conflicting stimulus feature. An auditory Stroop effect was observed when voice features replaced semantic content as the "to-be-ignored" component of the incongruent stimulus. Also, in sharp contrast to previous Stroop studies, neural responses to incongruent stimuli studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed greater recruitment of conflict loci when selective attention was focused on gender meaning (semantic task) over voice gender (sensory task). Furthermore, in contrast to earlier Stroop studies that implicated dorsomedial cortex in visual conflict processing, interference-related activation in both of our auditory tasks was localized ventrally in medial frontal areas, suggesting a dorsal-to-ventral separation of function in medial frontal cortex that is sensitive to stimulus context.

摘要

经典视觉斯特鲁普测试中干扰效应的一个常见解释是,阅读单词(更自动的语义反应)必须被抑制,以有利于命名文本颜色(较慢的感觉反应)。神经影像学研究也一致报告前扣带/内侧前额叶、外侧前额叶和前岛叶结构作为斯特鲁普冲突处理网络的关键组成部分。然而,语义信息的自动处理是否可以解释斯特鲁普测试的其他变体中的干扰效应仍然不清楚。也不知道这些额叶区域是否在视觉斯特鲁普冲突中发挥特定作用,或者作为更普遍的、超模式执行控制网络的组成部分,发挥更普遍的作用,用于冲突处理。为了解决这些问题,我们开发了一种新的听觉斯特鲁普测试,其中语义和感觉特征处理的相对优势被颠倒。要求听众专注于声音性别(更自动的感觉辨别任务)或单词的性别意义(较少自动的语义任务),同时忽略冲突的刺激特征。当声音特征取代语义内容成为不一致刺激的“忽略”成分时,观察到听觉斯特鲁普效应。此外,与之前的斯特鲁普研究形成鲜明对比的是,使用功能磁共振成像研究的不一致刺激的神经反应显示,当选择性注意力集中在性别意义(语义任务)而不是声音性别(感觉任务)上时,冲突部位的募集程度更大。此外,与先前涉及背内侧皮层参与视觉冲突处理的斯特鲁普研究相反,我们的两个听觉任务中与干扰相关的激活在中线额区的腹侧定位,表明中线额皮质的功能从背侧到腹侧分离,对刺激上下文敏感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd10/3020403/9b721ce790df/fnhum-04-00236-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验