• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人事务部住院治疗中的罕见不良医疗事件:将患者安全指标用作绩效衡量标准的可靠性限制

Rare adverse medical events in VA inpatient care: reliability limits to using patient safety indicators as performance measures.

作者信息

West Alan N, Weeks William B, Bagian James P

机构信息

VA Outcomes Group REAP, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT 05009, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):249-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00760.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00760.x
PMID:18211528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2323146/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) as performance measures using Veterans Administration hospitalization data. DATA SOURCES STUDY SETTING: Nine years (1997-2005) of all Veterans Health Administration (VA) administrative hospital discharge data.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis using diagnoses and procedures to derive annual rates and standard errors for 13 PSIs.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: For either hospitals or hospital networks (Veterans Integrated Service Networks [VISNs]), we calculated the percentages whose PSI rates were consistently high or low across years, as well as 1-year lagged correlations, for each PSI. We related our findings to the average annual number of adverse events that each PSI represents. We also assessed time trends for the entire VA, by VISN, and by hospital.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

PSI rates are more stable for VISNs than for individual hospitals, but only for those PSIs that reflect the most frequent adverse events. Only the most frequent PSIs yield significant time trends, and only for larger systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Because they are so rare, PSIs are not reliable performance measures to compare individual hospitals. The most frequent PSIs are more stable when applied to hospital networks, but needing large patient samples nullifies their potential value to managers seeking to improve quality locally or to patients seeking optimal care.

摘要

目的

利用退伍军人管理局的住院数据,评估医疗保健研究与质量局的患者安全指标(PSIs)作为绩效衡量指标。数据来源研究背景:九年(1997 - 2005年)的所有退伍军人健康管理局(VA)行政医院出院数据。

研究设计

采用回顾性分析,利用诊断和程序得出13项患者安全指标的年发生率和标准误差。

数据收集/提取方法:对于医院或医院网络(退伍军人综合服务网络[VISNs]),我们计算了各项患者安全指标在各年份中发生率持续偏高或偏低的百分比,以及滞后1年的相关性。我们将研究结果与每项患者安全指标所代表的平均每年不良事件数量联系起来。我们还评估了整个退伍军人管理局、按退伍军人综合服务网络以及按医院划分的时间趋势。

主要发现

退伍军人综合服务网络的患者安全指标发生率比个别医院更稳定,但仅针对那些反映最常见不良事件的指标。只有最常见的患者安全指标呈现出显著的时间趋势,且仅适用于较大的系统。

结论

由于患者安全指标极为罕见,因此它们并非用于比较个别医院的可靠绩效衡量指标。最常见的患者安全指标应用于医院网络时更稳定,但需要大量患者样本这一点削弱了它们对于寻求局部改善质量的管理人员或寻求最佳护理的患者的潜在价值。

相似文献

1
Rare adverse medical events in VA inpatient care: reliability limits to using patient safety indicators as performance measures.退伍军人事务部住院治疗中的罕见不良医疗事件:将患者安全指标用作绩效衡量标准的可靠性限制
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):249-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00760.x.
2
Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.
3
Comparing measures of patient safety for inpatient care provided to veterans within and outside the VA system in New York.比较纽约退伍军人事务部(VA)系统内外为退伍军人提供的住院护理的患者安全措施。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):58-64. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020735.
4
Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.医疗保健研究与质量机构的患者安全指标对儿童医院的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):135-45. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1083. Epub 2004 Dec 3.
5
Validity of selected AHRQ patient safety indicators based on VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.基于美国退伍军人事务部国家外科质量改进计划数据的选定美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标的有效性
Health Serv Res. 2009 Feb;44(1):182-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00905.x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
6
Tracking rates of Patient Safety Indicators over time: lessons from the Veterans Administration.随时间推移追踪患者安全指标的比率:来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。
Med Care. 2006 Sep;44(9):850-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220686.82472.9c.
7
Hospital safety climate and safety outcomes: is there a relationship in the VA?医院安全氛围与安全结果:退伍军人事务部是否存在关联?
Med Care Res Rev. 2010 Oct;67(5):590-608. doi: 10.1177/1077558709356703. Epub 2010 Feb 5.
8
Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
9
Using AHRQ patient safety indicators to detect postdischarge adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration.利用美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标检测退伍军人健康管理局出院后的不良事件。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):213-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860613494751. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
10
Using Harm-Based Weights for the AHRQ Patient Safety for Selected Indicators Composite (PSI-90): Does It Affect Assessment of Hospital Performance and Financial Penalties in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals?将基于伤害的权重用于美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)选定指标综合患者安全指数(PSI - 90):这会影响退伍军人健康管理局医院的医院绩效评估和财务处罚吗?
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2140-2157. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12596.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying Pediatric Patients at High Risk for Adverse Events in the Hospital.识别医院中发生不良事件的高危儿科患者。
Hosp Pediatr. 2019 Jan;9(1):67-69. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2018-0171. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Trigger Tool-Based Automated Adverse Event Detection in Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review.电子健康记录中基于触发工具的自动不良事件检测:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 30;20(5):e198. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9901.
3
Using structured telephone follow-up assessments to improve suicide-related adverse event detection.采用结构化电话随访评估以改善自杀相关不良事件的检测。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2014 Oct;44(5):537-47. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12088. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
4
Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety Indicators.检测手术中的不良事件:比较 Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program 和 Patient Safety Indicators 检测到的事件。
Am J Surg. 2014 Apr;207(4):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
The Emergence of the Trigger Tool as the Premier Measurement Strategy for Patient Safety.触发工具作为患者安全首要测量策略的出现。
AHRQ WebM&M. 2012 May 1;2012(5).
6
Reflections on improving hospital performance.关于提高医院绩效的思考
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 1):1457-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00903.x.
7
Epidemiology of anesthesia-related complications in labor and delivery, New York State, 2002-2005.2002 - 2005年纽约州分娩期麻醉相关并发症的流行病学
Anesth Analg. 2009 Oct;109(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b2ef75.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
2
Tracking rates of Patient Safety Indicators over time: lessons from the Veterans Administration.随时间推移追踪患者安全指标的比率:来自退伍军人事务部的经验教训。
Med Care. 2006 Sep;44(9):850-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220686.82472.9c.
3
Improving the bar-coded medication administration system at the Department of Veterans Affairs.改进美国退伍军人事务部的条形码给药系统。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Aug 1;63(15):1442-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050452.
4
Using the six sigma process to implement the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guideline for Hand Hygiene in 4 intensive care units.在4个重症监护病房采用六西格玛流程实施美国疾病控制与预防中心的手部卫生指南。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S35-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00361.x.
5
Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.
6
A cognitive aid for cardiac arrest: you can't use it if you don't know about it.一种用于心脏骤停的认知辅助工具:如果你不了解它,就无法使用它。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Sep;30(9):488-96. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30057-2.
7
Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review.基于行政数据的患者安全研究:一项批判性综述。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii58-63. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii58.
8
Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization.住院期间因医疗损伤导致的住院时间延长、费用增加及死亡情况。
JAMA. 2003 Oct 8;290(14):1868-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.14.1868.
9
Using aggregate root cause analysis to improve patient safety.运用综合根本原因分析来提高患者安全。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Aug;29(8):434-9, 381. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29052-3.
10
John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety Awards. System innovation: Veterans Health Administration National Center for Patient Safety.约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全奖。系统创新:退伍军人健康管理局国家患者安全中心。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Dec;28(12):660-5. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28071-2.