• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标检测退伍军人健康管理局出院后的不良事件。

Using AHRQ patient safety indicators to detect postdischarge adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration.

作者信息

Mull Hillary J, Borzecki Ann M, Chen Qi, Shin Marlena H, Rosen Amy K

机构信息

1VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):213-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860613494751. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1177/1062860613494751
PMID:23939485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4562225/
Abstract

Patient safety indicators (PSIs) use inpatient administrative data to flag cases with potentially preventable adverse events (AEs) attributable to hospital care. This study explored how many AEs the PSIs identified in the 30 days post discharge. PSI software was run on Veterans Health Administration 2003-2007 administrative data for 10 recently validated PSIs. Among PSI-eligible index hospitalizations not flagged with an AE, this study evaluated how many AEs occurred within 1 to 14 and 15 to 30 days post discharge using inpatient and outpatient administrative data. Considering all PSI-eligible index hospitalizations, 11 141 postdischarge AEs were identified, compared with 40 578 inpatient-flagged AEs. More than 60% of postdischarge AEs were detected within 14 days of discharge. The majority of postdischarge AEs were decubitus ulcers and postoperative pulmonary embolisms or deep vein thromboses. Extending PSI algorithms to the postdischarge period may provide a more complete picture of hospital quality. Future work should use chart review to validate postdischarge PSI events.

摘要

患者安全指标(PSIs)利用住院患者管理数据来标记因医院护理导致的具有潜在可预防不良事件(AEs)的病例。本研究探讨了PSIs在出院后30天内识别出多少不良事件。针对10项最近经过验证的PSIs,在退伍军人健康管理局2003 - 2007年管理数据上运行PSI软件。在未被AE标记的符合PSI条件的索引住院病例中,本研究利用住院和门诊管理数据评估了出院后1至14天以及15至30天内发生了多少不良事件。考虑所有符合PSI条件的索引住院病例,共识别出11141例出院后不良事件,相比之下,住院期间被标记的不良事件有40578例。超过60%的出院后不良事件在出院后14天内被检测到。出院后不良事件大多为褥疮以及术后肺栓塞或深静脉血栓形成。将PSI算法扩展至出院后时期可能会更全面地反映医院质量。未来的工作应通过病历审查来验证出院后PSI事件。

相似文献

1
Using AHRQ patient safety indicators to detect postdischarge adverse events in the Veterans Health Administration.利用美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标检测退伍军人健康管理局出院后的不良事件。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):213-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860613494751. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Using estimated true safety event rates versus flagged safety event rates: does it change hospital profiling and payment?使用估计的真实安全事件率与标记的安全事件率:这会改变医院的形象和支付方式吗?
Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct;49(5):1426-45. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12180. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
3
Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.审查 AHRQ 患者安全指标 (PSIs) 对退伍军人健康管理局的影响:再入院案例。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7.
4
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
5
Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
6
Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicator Rates Among Veteran Dual Users.退伍军人双重使用者中医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全指标率的比较。
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):335-43. doi: 10.1177/1062860613499402. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
7
Detecting adverse events in surgery: comparing events detected by the Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the Patient Safety Indicators.检测手术中的不良事件:比较 Veterans Health Administration Surgical Quality Improvement Program 和 Patient Safety Indicators 检测到的事件。
Am J Surg. 2014 Apr;207(4):584-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.031. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
8
Using the patient safety indicators to detect potential safety events among US veterans with psychotic disorders: clinical and research implications.利用患者安全指标检测美国患有精神障碍的退伍军人中的潜在安全事件:临床和研究意义。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):321-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs026. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
9
Evaluating the patient safety indicators: how well do they perform on Veterans Health Administration data?评估患者安全指标:它们在退伍军人健康管理局的数据上表现如何?
Med Care. 2005 Sep;43(9):873-84. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000173561.79742.fb.
10
Do the AHRQ patient safety indicators flag conditions that are present at the time of hospital admission?医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的患者安全指标是否能标记出入院时就已存在的病症?
Med Care. 2008 May;46(5):516-22. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31815f537f.

引用本文的文献

1
Geriatric Patient Safety Indicators Based on Linked Administrative Health Data to Assess Anticoagulant-Related Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Adverse Events in Older Inpatients: A Study Proposal.基于关联行政健康数据的老年患者安全指标,用于评估老年住院患者抗凝相关血栓栓塞和出血不良事件:一项研究提案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 11;6(5):e82. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7562.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the impact of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) on the Veterans Health Administration: the case of readmissions.审查 AHRQ 患者安全指标 (PSIs) 对退伍军人健康管理局的影响:再入院案例。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270c0f7.
2
Validating the patient safety indicators in the Veterans Health Administration: do they accurately identify true safety events?验证退伍军人健康管理局的患者安全指标:它们是否能准确识别真实的安全事件?
Med Care. 2012 Jan;50(1):74-85. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182293edf.
3
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative physiologic and metabolic derangement"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后生理和代谢紊乱”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):968-976.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
4
Validity of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections".AHRQ 患者安全指标“中心静脉导管相关血流感染”的有效性。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):984-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
5
Detecting patient safety indicators: How valid is "foreign body left during procedure" in the Veterans Health Administration?检测患者安全指标:退伍军人健康管理局的“手术中遗留异物”有多准确?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):977-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
6
Positive predictive value of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative wound dehiscence".AHRQ 患者安全指标“术后伤口裂开”的阳性预测值。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):962-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.053. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
7
Positive predictive value of the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "Postoperative Sepsis": implications for practice and policy.AHRQ 患者安全指标“术后败血症”的阳性预测值:对实践和政策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):954-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.11.013. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
8
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后出血或血肿”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):946-953.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.033. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
How valid is the AHRQ Patient Safety Indicator "postoperative respiratory failure"?美国卫生保健研究与质量署患者安全指标“术后呼吸衰竭”的有效性如何?
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):935-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.034. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
10
Validity of selected Patient Safety Indicators: opportunities and concerns.选定的患者安全指标的有效性:机会与关注。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Jun;212(6):924-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Dec 14.