Dept. of Stat., Washington Univ., Seattle, WA.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1993;12(4):653-63. doi: 10.1109/42.251115.
The problem of negative artifacts in emission tomography reconstructions computed by filtered backprojection (FBP) is of practical concern particularly in low count studies. Statistical reconstruction methods based on maximum likelihood (ML) are automatically constrained to be non-negative but their excessive computational overhead (orders of magnitude greater than FBP) has limited their use in operational settings. Motivated by the statistical character of the negativity artifact, the authors develop a simple post-processing technique that iteratively adjusts negative values by cancellation with positive values in a surrounding local neighborhood. The compute time of this approach is roughly equivalent to 2 applications of FBP. The approach was evaluated by numerical simulation in 1- and 2-dimensional (2D) settings. In 2D, the source distributions included the Hoffman, the Shepp and Vardi, and a digitized version of the Jaszczak cold spheres phantoms. The authors' studies compared smoothed versions of FBP, the post-processed FBP, and ML implemented by the expectation-maximization algorithm. The root mean square (RMS) error between the true and estimated source distribution was used to evaluate performance; in 2D, additional region-of-interest-based measures of reconstruction accuracy were also employed. In making comparisons between the different methods, the amount of smoothing applied to each reconstruction method was adapted to minimize the RMS error-this was found to be critical.
滤波反投影(FBP)重建发射断层扫描中负像元问题是一个实际问题,特别是在低计数研究中。基于最大似然(ML)的统计重建方法自动受到非负约束,但由于其计算开销过大(比 FBP 大几个数量级),限制了其在实际应用中的使用。受负像元统计特征的启发,作者开发了一种简单的后处理技术,通过在周围局部邻域中与正像元相消来迭代调整负像元的值。这种方法的计算时间大致相当于 FBP 的 2 次应用。该方法在 1 维和 2 维(2D)环境中通过数值模拟进行了评估。在 2D 中,源分布包括 Hoffman、Shepp 和 Vardi 分布,以及 Jaszczak 冷球体模型的数字化版本。作者的研究比较了 FBP 的平滑版本、经过后处理的 FBP 和通过期望最大化算法实现的 ML。使用真实和估计源分布之间的均方根(RMS)误差来评估性能;在 2D 中,还采用了基于感兴趣区域的重建准确性的额外度量。在比较不同方法时,对每种重建方法应用的平滑量进行了调整,以最小化 RMS 误差,这一点至关重要。