Anderson Elaine J, Husain Masud, Sumner Petroc
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):838-851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.046. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
How are stimulus-driven reflexes generated, and what controls their competition with voluntary action? The saccadic reflex to look towards an abrupt visual onset (prosaccade) has been associated with the retinotectal and magnocellular pathways, which rapidly convey signals to the superior colliculus and cortical eye fields. Such stimulus-driven reflexes need to be suppressed when making an eye movement in the opposite direction (antisaccade), resulting in a cost in saccade latency. We compared the latencies of pro- and anti-saccades elicited by conventional luminance stimuli with those evoked by stimuli visible only to short-wave-sensitive cones (S cones) embedded in dynamic luminance noise. Critically, the retinotectal and magnocellular pathways are functionally blind to such stimuli. Compared to luminance stimuli, antisaccade latency costs were significantly reduced for 'S-cone' stimuli. This behavioural interaction is consistent with reduced competition between reflexive and endogenous saccade plans when S-cone stimuli are employed, while other processes involved in making an antisaccade, such as changing preparatory set or generating an endogenous saccade, are predicted to be equivalent for each kind of stimulus. Using fMRI, we found that activity in the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) mirrored the behavioural interaction in saccade latencies. Thus, the right IPS appears to index the degree of competition between exogenous and endogenous saccade plans, showing the activity pattern predicted for an area involved in suppressing the saccade reflex. Furthermore, signals recorded from the superior colliculus showed the reverse pattern of responses, consistent with a direct inhibitory influence of IPS on SC.
刺激驱动的反射是如何产生的,以及是什么控制着它们与自主行动之间的竞争?看向突然出现的视觉刺激(前跳视)的扫视反射与视网膜顶盖和大细胞通路有关,这些通路将信号迅速传递到上丘和皮质眼区。当向相反方向进行眼球运动(反跳视)时,这种刺激驱动的反射需要被抑制,这会导致扫视潜伏期增加。我们比较了传统亮度刺激引发的前跳视和反跳视的潜伏期与嵌入动态亮度噪声中仅对短波敏感视锥细胞(S视锥细胞)可见的刺激所引发的潜伏期。关键的是,视网膜顶盖和大细胞通路对这类刺激在功能上是盲的。与亮度刺激相比,“S视锥细胞”刺激的反跳视潜伏期代价显著降低。这种行为上的相互作用与使用S视锥细胞刺激时反射性和内源性扫视计划之间竞争的减少是一致的,而进行反跳视时涉及的其他过程,如改变准备状态或产生内源性扫视,预计对每种刺激都是相同的。通过功能磁共振成像,我们发现右侧顶内沟(IPS)的活动反映了扫视潜伏期的行为相互作用。因此,右侧顶内沟似乎指示了外源性和内源性扫视计划之间的竞争程度,显示出与参与抑制扫视反射区域预期的活动模式。此外,从上丘记录的信号显示出相反的反应模式,这与顶内沟对中脑上丘的直接抑制作用一致。