Suppr超能文献

一份依从性自我报告问卷有助于区分对抗高血压治疗的不依从和无反应。

An adherence self-report questionnaire facilitated the differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to antihypertensive treatment.

作者信息

Zeller Andreas, Schroeder Knut, Peters Tim J

机构信息

Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Cotham House, Cotham Hill, BS6 6JL Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Mar;61(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate, among hypertensive patients, a brief adherence self-report questionnaire (ASRQ), using electronic monitors (medical event monitoring system, MEMS) as the gold standard comparator.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A total of 239 patients with hypertension in five general practices in Bristol, UK completed the ASRQ before and at the end of the 4-week study period. Patients were asked to choose one of six descriptions (from level 1=perfect adherence to level 6=nonadherence) to express their medication taking. The main outcome measure was "timing adherence" (correct interdose intervals) as measured through electronic monitors.

RESULTS

Most patients (89%) stated perfect or nearly perfect adherence, and data from the electronic monitors showed a mean timing adherence of 88.3% (n=216). Using the cutoff of those who reported ASRQ levels 1 and 2 (all tablets taken but not always at the same time of day), a high percentage of those with comparatively high adherence according to MEMS were correctly identified (specificity, 90-93%; negative predictive value, 66-96%). However, sensitivity (detection of true nonadherers) and positive predictive value were poor to moderate (14-42% and 22-66%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The questionnaire could be a useful aid to facilitate the difficult differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to prescribed antihypertensive medication.

摘要

目的

在高血压患者中,以电子监测器(医疗事件监测系统,MEMS)作为金标准对照,评估一份简短的依从性自我报告问卷(ASRQ)。

研究设计与背景

英国布里斯托尔的5家全科诊所的239名高血压患者在4周研究期开始前和结束时完成了ASRQ。患者被要求从6种描述(从1级 = 完全依从到6级 = 不依从)中选择一种来表达他们的服药情况。主要结局指标是通过电子监测器测量的“时间依从性”(正确的给药间隔)。

结果

大多数患者(89%)表示完全或几乎完全依从,电子监测器的数据显示平均时间依从性为88.3%(n = 216)。使用报告ASRQ 1级和2级(所有药片都服用了,但并非总是在同一天的同一时间)的患者作为截断值,根据MEMS具有较高依从性的患者中有很大比例被正确识别(特异性,90 - 93%;阴性预测值,66 - 96%)。然而,敏感性(检测真正的不依从者)和阳性预测值较差至中等(分别为14 - 42%和22 - 66%)。

结论

该问卷可能有助于促进区分不依从和对规定降压药物无反应这一难题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验