Brencher H L, Kohl P, Reinke A R, Yolton R L
Pacific University, College of Optometry, Forest Grove, OR 97116.
J Am Optom Assoc. 1991 May;62(5):395-402.
Intraocular pressures (IOPs) as measured with the Topcon CT-10, Reichert XPERT and NCT II, and Keeler PULSAIR air-puff tonometers were compared to the Goldmann IOPs for 452 eyes ranging in pressure from 6-40 mmHg. For eyes with pressures in the 10-20 mmHg range, the CT-10 read consistently too high. The XPERT and the NCT II read too high in the lower part of this range and too low in the higher part. The PULSAIR read too low across the entire range. At higher pressures, all of the tonometers read too high except the PULSAIR which again read too low. CT-10, XPERT, and NCT II and PULSAIR pressures were within 4.0 mmHg of Goldmann readings for 81, 85, 89 and 72 percent of the eyes, respectively. Subjects selected the XPERT as the most preferred tonometer and the NCT II was the least preferred mainly because of perceived air-puff intensity.
将使用拓普康CT - 10、瑞特XPERT和NCT II以及基勒PULSAIR气吹眼压计测量的眼内压（IOP）与戈德曼眼压计测量的452只眼压在6 - 40 mmHg范围内的眼睛的眼压进行比较。对于眼压在10 - 20 mmHg范围内的眼睛，CT - 10的读数始终偏高。XPERT和NCT II在此范围的较低部分读数偏高，而在较高部分读数偏低。PULSAIR在整个范围内读数偏低。在较高眼压时，除PULSAIR读数再次偏低外，所有眼压计读数都偏高。CT - 10、XPERT、NCT II和PULSAIR测量的眼压分别在81%、85%、89%和72%的眼睛中与戈德曼眼压计读数相差在4.0 mmHg以内。受试者选择XPERT作为最受欢迎的眼压计，而NCT II是最不受欢迎的，主要原因是感觉气吹强度问题。
