• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry.Keeler Pulsair 3000与Goldmann压平眼压计的临床比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1303-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303.
2
Comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer.尼德克NT - 2000非接触眼压计与基勒Pulsair 2000眼压计及戈德曼压平眼压计性能比较。
Optom Vis Sci. 1997 Jan;74(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199701000-00020.
3
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the Reichert Pt100, the Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff portable noncontact tonometers, and Goldmann applanation tonometry.使用Reichert Pt100眼压计、Keeler Pulsair Intellipuff便携式非接触眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2015 Jun-Jul;24(5):356-63. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000435776.99193.41.
4
Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.新型非接触眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 3):332-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.48.
5
Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000, American Optical MkII and Goldmann applanation tonometers.Keeler Pulsair 2000眼压计、美国光学MkII眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计的临床比较。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996 Mar;16(2):171-7.
6
Comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.Keeler Pulsair 2000型非接触眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 1):127-30. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.26.
7
Clinical evaluation of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 non-contact tonometer.Keeler Pulsair 3000非接触眼压计的临床评估
Optometry. 2002 Feb;73(2):81-90.
8
Evaluation of the Tono-Pen and the Pulsair tonometers.眼压笔和脉冲式眼压计的评估。
Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Jun 15;109(6):716-20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72442-0.
9
Deterioration in the accuracy of the pulsair non-contact tonometer with use: need for regular calibration.使用过程中Pulsair非接触眼压计准确性的下降：需要定期校准。
Eye (Lond). 1992;6 ( Pt 5):530-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.1992.112.
10
[Reproducibility of the results of two non-contact tonometers. Comparison with the Goldmann applanation tonometer].[两种非接触眼压计测量结果的可重复性。与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1992 Jun;200(6):678-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1045857.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Assessment of Automated Non-Contact Tonometer: Interchangeability with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Repeatability.自动非接触眼压计的临床评估：与戈德曼压平眼压计的互换性及可重复性
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2726. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082726.
2
Accuracy of a novel method for IOP measurement without applying pressure on the cornea.一种新型眼压测量方法，无需对角膜施加压力，其准确性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jul 1;44(1):300. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03213-7.
3
Identification of a circulating three-miRNA panel for the diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma.用于原发性开角型青光眼诊断的循环三 miRNA 检测组合的鉴定
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 15;44(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03100-1.
4
Association of intraocular pressure and postoperative nausea and vomiting after microvascular decompression - a prospective cohort study.眼内压与微血管减压术后恶心和呕吐的关系：一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Apr 30;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01665-x.
5
Measurement of Intraocular Pressure with Applanation, Dynamic Contour, and Air-Puff Tonometers: A Comparative Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Healthy Cases.使用压平眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和气流眼压计测量眼压：原发性开角型青光眼与健康病例的比较研究
Beyoglu Eye J. 2020 Dec 28;5(3):178-187. doi: 10.14744/bej.2020.82713. eCollection 2020.
6
A comparison of NCT, Goldman application tonometry values with and without fluorescein.非接触眼压计（NCT）、使用和不使用荧光素的戈德曼压平眼压计测量值的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 29;12:2183-2188. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S177870. eCollection 2018.
7
Tonometers-which one should I use?眼压计——我应该用哪一种？
Eye (Lond). 2018 May;32(5):931-937. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0040-4. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
8
Detecting IOP Fluctuations in Glaucoma Patients.检测青光眼患者的眼压波动
Open Ophthalmol J. 2016 Feb 29;10:44-55. doi: 10.2174/1874364101610010044. eCollection 2016.
9
Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL.正常受试者三种眼压测量方法的比较：戈德曼压平眼压计、非接触式气动眼压计和托诺笔XL眼压计。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 7;8:1069-74. doi: 10.2147/opth.s6391. eCollection 2014.
10
Applanation tonometry: a comparison of the Perkins handheld and Goldmann slit lamp-mounted methods.压平眼压测量法：帕金斯手持式与戈德曼裂隙灯-mounted方法的比较。 （注：这里“Goldmann slit lamp-mounted methods”中的“mounted”翻译为“安装在……上的”，整体表述可能因专业语境稍显生硬，但按要求忠实翻译）
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar 26;8:605-10. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S53544. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum.规范临床研究中眼压测量方法。眼保健技术论坛指南。
Ophthalmology. 1996 Jan;103(1):183-5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30741-0.
2
Clinical evaluation of five portable tonometers.五种便携式眼压计的临床评估
J Am Optom Assoc. 1995 Nov;66(11):670-4.
3
Reproducibility with the Keeler Pulsair 2000 non-contact tonometer.使用Keeler Pulsair 2000非接触式眼压计的可重复性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Jun;79(6):554-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.6.554.
4
Effects of repeated tonometry: genuine and sham measurements.反复眼压测量的效果：真实测量与假测量
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1972;50(4):574-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1972.tb05987.x.
5
Is applanation tonometry a risk factor for transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease?压平式眼压测量法是克雅氏病传播的危险因素吗？
Arch Ophthalmol. 1987 Mar;105(3):314. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060030028007.
6
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
7
Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanation.新型非接触眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计的比较。
Eye (Lond). 1989;3 ( Pt 3):332-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.1989.48.
8
Clinical comparison of air-puff and Goldmann tonometers.空气压平眼压计与戈德曼眼压计的临床比较。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1991 May;62(5):395-402.

Keeler Pulsair 3000与Goldmann压平眼压计的临床比较。

Clinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry.

作者信息

Parker V A, Herrtage J, Sarkies N J

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Addenbrooke's Hospital Trust, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1303-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303
PMID:11673293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1723760/
Abstract

AIM

To confirm the accuracy of the Pulsair 3000 before introducing the instrument into clinical practice.

METHOD

A masked study by two experienced tonometrists comparing the mean of the Goldmann intraocular pressure (IOP) readings against the Pulsair 3000 reading (average of four puffs). Results of 150 eyes were compared with an IOP range of 10 mm Hg-44 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Correlation between the two Goldmann tonometry results was 0.9830 with a standard deviation of 1.1085 mm Hg. Correlation between the mean of the two Goldmann readings against the Pulsair 3000 reading was 0.982 with a standard deviation of 1.1179 mm Hg. Bland-Altman analysis confirms a satisfactory outcome.

CONCLUSION

The Pulsair 3000 provides an accurate and objective method of measuring IOP with many advantages over traditional Goldmann tonometry.

摘要

目的

在将Pulsair 3000仪器引入临床实践之前，确认其准确性。

方法

由两名经验丰富的眼压测量师进行一项盲法研究，比较Goldmann眼压（IOP）读数的平均值与Pulsair 3000读数（四次吹气的平均值）。将150只眼睛的结果与10毫米汞柱至44毫米汞柱的眼压范围进行比较。

结果

两次Goldmann眼压测量结果之间的相关性为0.9830，标准差为1.1085毫米汞柱。两次Goldmann读数的平均值与Pulsair 3000读数之间的相关性为0.982，标准差为1.1179毫米汞柱。Bland-Altman分析证实结果令人满意。

结论

Pulsair 3000提供了一种准确、客观的眼压测量方法，与传统的Goldmann眼压测量法相比有许多优点。