• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用XPERT非接触眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。

A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.

作者信息

Popovich K S, Shields M B

机构信息

Joseph M. Bryan Glaucoma Clinic, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 1997 Feb;6(1):44-6.

PMID:9075080
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare intraocular pressure measurements obtained with XPERT, an upgraded model of the noncontact tonometer, with those from Goldmann applanation tonometry.

METHODS

An average of three intraocular pressure measurements, generated by the XPERT, was compared with a single reading from a Goldmann applanation tonometer in 421 eyes of 220 patients.

RESULTS

The standard deviation of the matched-pair differences (Sdiff) for the entire population was 2.3 mm Hg, whereas in a subset of 95 eyes with intraocular pressures of > or = 20 mm Hg by Goldmann applanation tonometry, the Sdiff was 3.3 mm Hg.

CONCLUSIONS

The XPERT was found to provide reliable intraocular pressure measurements, especially within the normal range.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用非接触眼压计的升级版XPERT测量的眼压与Goldmann压平眼压计测量的眼压。

方法

在220例患者的421只眼中,将XPERT平均测量的三次眼压与Goldmann压平眼压计单次测量的眼压进行比较。

结果

整个人群配对差值的标准差(Sdiff)为2.3 mmHg,而在Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压≥20 mmHg的95只眼亚组中,Sdiff为3.3 mmHg。

结论

发现XPERT能提供可靠的眼压测量值,尤其是在正常范围内。

相似文献

1
A comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.使用XPERT非接触眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。
J Glaucoma. 1997 Feb;6(1):44-6.
2
[Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus a transpalpebral tonometer TGDc-01"PRA" in glaucoma patients].[青光眼患者使用Goldmann压平眼压计与经睑眼压计TGDc - 01“PRA”测量的眼压差]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2005 Feb;222(2):123-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857881.
3
[Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].[使用Proview自动眼压计测量眼压并与Goldmann压平眼压计在健康眼和青光眼眼中的测量结果进行比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Nov;223(11):899-903. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927094.
4
[Measurement of intraocular pressure using the Tono-Pen in comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometry - a clinical study in 100 eyes].[使用眼压笔测量眼压与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较——100只眼的临床研究]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2002 Mar;219(3):138-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-26718.
5
Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.回弹式眼压计与三种压平式眼压计测量眼压的一致性
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;142(2):332-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035.
6
Glaucoma screening in primary care: the role of noncontact tonometry.基层医疗中的青光眼筛查:非接触眼压测量法的作用
J Fam Pract. 1992 Jan;34(1):73-7.
7
Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes.比较 Goldmann 压平眼压计、非接触眼压计和 TonoPen XL 在不同类型青光眼、高眼压和正常眼中的眼压测量。
Curr Eye Res. 2011 Apr;36(4):295-300. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2010.542865. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Accuracy and reliability of the Keeler Pulsair EasyEye non-contact tonometer.基勒Pulsair EasyEye非接触眼压计的准确性和可靠性。
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;85(1):61-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31815ed742.
9
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.比较治疗青光眼患者的眼压回弹式测量、非接触式眼压测量和 Goldmann 压平眼压测量。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):e163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02670.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
10
Clinical evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者眼压测量仪的临床评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;89(5):537-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.050922.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.在正常和青光眼患者中,比较tono-pachy校正眼压与Goldmann压平眼压测量法的眼压。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):620-626. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19.
2
Comparison of Goldmann Applanation, Noncontact Air Puff, and Tono-Pen XL Tonometry in Normal Controls versus Glaucoma Patients at a University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得某大学医院中正常对照人群与青光眼患者的Goldmann压平眼压计、非接触式气眼压计和Tono-Pen XL眼压计测量结果比较
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan-Mar;25(1):8-13. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_291_16.
3
Tonometry and Care of Tonometers.
眼压测量法及眼压计的保养
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2012 Sep-Dec;6(3):124-30. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1119. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
4
Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL.正常受试者三种眼压测量方法的比较:戈德曼压平眼压计、非接触式气动眼压计和托诺笔XL眼压计。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 7;8:1069-74. doi: 10.2147/opth.s6391. eCollection 2014.
5
Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.儿童眼压反弹:美国眼科学会报告。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):e21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.058. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
6
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry.使用便携式PT100非接触眼压计和戈德曼压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:341-4. doi: 10.2147/opth.s5537. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
7
A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.四种眼压测量方法的比较:方法一致性和观察者间变异性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):847-50. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614.