• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

15项特质性心理韧性量表的重测信度,一种简短的心理坚韧性量表。

Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale.

作者信息

Bartone Paul T

机构信息

Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University, Ft. McNair, Washington, DC 20319, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):943-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944
PMID:18232452
Abstract

Test-retest correlations provide the most appropriate estimate of reliability when short scales are used to measure complex constructs. A brief, 15-item hardiness scale was developed from a longer version known as the Dispositional Resilience Scale (DRS), which first appeared in 1989. This short hardiness scale (DRS-15) has the advantages of brevity, good internal consistency, and validity (Barone, 1995, - 1999); however, test-retest reliability has not yet been estimated. The present study addresses this issue, using a sample of 104 military academy cadets. The 3-wk. test-retest reliability coefficient was .78.

摘要

当使用短量表来测量复杂结构时,重测信度能提供最恰当的信度估计。一个简短的、由15个项目组成的心理韧性量表是从一个较长版本即1989年首次出现的特质复原力量表(DRS)发展而来的。这个简短的心理韧性量表(DRS - 15)具有简短、良好的内部一致性和效度的优点(巴龙,1995 - 1999);然而,重测信度尚未得到评估。本研究以104名军校学员为样本解决了这个问题。3周的重测信度系数为0.78。

相似文献

1
Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale.15项特质性心理韧性量表的重测信度,一种简短的心理坚韧性量表。
Psychol Rep. 2007 Dec;101(3 Pt 1):943-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944.
2
Development and validation of the Italian version of the 15-item dispositional resilience scale.15 项特质韧性量表意大利语版的编制与验证。
Riv Psichiatr. 2012 May-Jun;47(3):231-7. doi: 10.1708/1128.12446.
3
Psychometric properties of the revised Norwegian dispositional resilience (hardiness) scale.修订后的挪威性格韧性(坚韧)量表的心理测量特性。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Jun 1;51(3):237-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00759.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
4
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the 15-item Dispositional Resilience Scale.15 项特质韧性量表的韩文版的信度和效度。
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Jan-Dec;23(sup1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1417612.
5
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.慢性精神疾病患者康复评估量表(RAS)的日语版的信度和效度:量表编制。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Mar;47(3):314-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
6
Note on psychometric properties of playfulness scales with adolescents.关于青少年嬉戏量表心理测量特性的说明。
Psychol Rep. 2005 Jun;96(3 Pt 2):993-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.96.3c.993-994.
7
Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain.骨盆带疼痛患者自评问卷的信度和结构效度。
Phys Ther. 2012 Jan;92(1):111-23. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110076. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
8
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptoms.土耳其版患者健康问卷躯体、焦虑和抑郁症状的心理测量特性。
Compr Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;53(5):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Attitudes toward the elderly among the health care providers: reliability and validity of Turkish version of the UCLA Geriatrics Attitudes (UCLA-GA) scale.医护人员对老年人的态度:土耳其版加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校老年医学态度量表(UCLA-GA)的信度和效度。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jul-Aug;55(1):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
10
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the Chinese version of the self-report health-related quality of life measure for children and adolescents with epilepsy.中文版癫痫儿童及青少年自我报告健康相关生活质量量表的内部一致性和重测信度
Epilepsy Behav. 2006 Aug;9(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.04.003. Epub 2006 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Burnout syndrome and the protective role of resilience among university professors: a cross-sectional study of associated psychosocial and physical factors.职业倦怠综合征与大学教授心理韧性的保护作用:一项关于相关心理社会因素和身体因素的横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 1;16:1616489. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1616489. eCollection 2025.
2
Brief resilience scale (BRS) in a sample of Indian college students: evidence of psychometric properties.印度大学生样本中的简易复原力量表(BRS):心理测量特性的证据
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;13(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03234-6.
3
Adverse Childhood Experiences and Psychological Correlates in College Students: A Comparison of Student-Athletes and Non-Student-Athletes.
大学生童年不良经历及其心理关联:学生运动员与非学生运动员的比较
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;13(7):194. doi: 10.3390/sports13070194.
4
Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Existential Well-Being.一份关于存在幸福感的自我报告测量工具的开发与验证
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2025 May 5;21:e17450179366317. doi: 10.2174/0117450179366317250410071321. eCollection 2025.
5
Examining the Relationship Between Resilience, Mental Health and Fitness Outcomes in Firefighters.探究消防员的心理韧性、心理健康与体能结果之间的关系。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025 Apr 24;10(2):142. doi: 10.3390/jfmk10020142.
6
Intrinsic brain functional connectivity mediates the relationship between psychological resilience and cognitive decline in ageing.大脑内在功能连接介导了衰老过程中心理弹性与认知衰退之间的关系。
Geroscience. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01529-5.
7
New norm values of the brief resilience scale (BRS) from the German general population with new post-COVID-19 data.来自德国普通人群的简短恢复力量表(BRS)的新常模值,以及新的 COVID-19 后数据。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Sep 27;12(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01995-0.
8
A rank ordering and analysis of four cognitive-behavioral stress-management competencies suggests that proactive stress management is especially valuable.对四种认知行为压力管理能力进行等级排序和分析表明,积极主动的压力管理尤为有价值。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68328-4.
9
Resilience and attitudes toward help-seeking as correlates of psychological well-being among a sample of New Zealand Defence Force personnel.新西兰国防军人员样本中,心理韧性和求助态度与心理健康的相关性。
Mil Psychol. 2020 Jun 4;32(4):329-340. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2020.1754148. eCollection 2020.
10
Psychological hardiness, personality factors and coping styles in male patients of alcohol dependence syndrome.酒精依赖综合征男性患者的心理韧性、人格因素及应对方式
Med J Armed Forces India. 2024 Mar-Apr;80(2):172-177. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2022.07.007. Epub 2023 Oct 14.