Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Behav Brain Funct. 2008 Jan 30;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-4-4.
It has been hypothesized that genetic and environmental factors relate to psychiatric disorders through the effect of intermediating, vulnerability traits called endophenotypes. The study had a threefold aim: to examine the predictive validity of an endophenotypic construct for the ADHD diagnosis, to test whether the magnitude of group differences at the endophenotypic and phenotypic level is comparable, and to investigate whether four factors (gender, age, IQ, rater bias) have an effect (moderation or mediation) on the relation between endophenotype and phenotype.
Ten neurocognitive tasks were administered to 143 children with ADHD, 68 non-affected siblings, and 120 control children (first-borns) and 132 children with ADHD, 78 non-affected siblings, and 113 controls (second-borns) (5 - 19 years). The task measures have been investigated previously for their endophenotypic viability and were combined to one component which was labeled 'the endophenotypic construct': one measure representative of endophenotypic functioning across several domains of functioning.
The endophenotypic construct classified children with moderate accuracy (about 50% for each of the three groups). Non-affected children differed as much from controls at the endophenotypic as at the phenotypic level, but affected children displayed a more severe phenotype than endophenotype. Although a potentially moderating effect (age) and several mediating effects (gender, age, IQ) were found affecting the relation between endophenotypic construct and phenotype, none of the effects studied could account for the finding that affected children had a more severe phenotype than endophenotype.
Endophenotypic functioning is moderately predictive of the ADHD diagnosis, though findings suggest substantial overlap exists between endophenotypic functioning in the groups of affected children, non-affected siblings, and controls. Results suggest other factors may be crucial and aggravate the ADHD symptoms in affected children.
有人假设,遗传和环境因素通过中介脆弱特质(称为内表型)对精神疾病产生影响。该研究有三个目的:检验内表型结构对 ADHD 诊断的预测效度,检验在表型和内表型水平上的组间差异幅度是否相当,以及调查四个因素(性别、年龄、智商、评定者偏差)对内表型与表型之间关系是否有影响(调节或中介)。
对 143 名 ADHD 患儿、68 名非患病同胞和 120 名对照儿童(头胎),以及 132 名 ADHD 患儿、78 名非患病同胞和 113 名对照儿童(二胎)(5-19 岁)进行了 10 项神经认知任务测试。先前已经对这些任务测试的内表型可行性进行了研究,并将其组合成一个组件,称为“内表型结构”:一个跨多个功能领域代表内表型功能的测量。
内表型结构对儿童的分类具有中等准确性(三组中每组约 50%)。非患病儿童在表型和内表型上与对照组的差异同样大,但患病儿童的表型比内表型更严重。虽然发现了潜在的调节作用(年龄)和几个中介作用(性别、年龄、智商)影响内表型结构和表型之间的关系,但研究中的任何作用都不能解释患病儿童的表型比内表型更严重的发现。
内表型功能对内 ADHA 诊断具有中等预测性,但研究结果表明,患病儿童、非患病同胞和对照组之间的内表型功能存在很大重叠。结果表明,其他因素可能至关重要,加剧了患病儿童的 ADHD 症状。