• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Examining the effects of school-based drug prevention programs on drug use in rural settings: methodology and initial findings.考察农村地区校本毒品预防项目对毒品使用的影响:方法与初步研究结果
J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl(Suppl):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00121.x.
2
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
3
Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students.美国城乡学生对酒精、烟草及其他物质的易获取感知情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3397. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
4
Individual-, family-, and school-level interventions targeting multiple risk behaviours in young people.针对年轻人多种风险行为的个人、家庭和学校层面的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 5;10(10):CD009927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009927.pub2.
5
Adapting evidence-based programs to new contexts: what needs to be changed?使循证项目适应新环境:需要改变什么?
J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl:37-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00122.x.
6
Independent Evaluation of Middle School-Based Drug Prevention Curricula: A Systematic Review.基于中学的毒品预防课程的独立评估:一项系统综述。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Nov;169(11):1046-52. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.1736.
7
Impact of a positive youth development program in urban after-school settings on the prevention of adolescent substance use.城市课后活动场所积极青少年发展项目对预防青少年药物使用的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2007 Sep;41(3):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.02.016. Epub 2007 May 3.
8
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.以学校为基础的家庭哮喘教育项目对5至18岁确诊哮喘儿童生活质量和哮喘发作次数的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335.
9
Australian school-based prevention programs for alcohol and other drugs: a systematic review.澳大利亚基于学校的预防酒精和其他药物滥用项目:系统评价。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012 Sep;31(6):731-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00420.x. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
10
Effectiveness of the universal prevention program 'Healthy School and Drugs': study protocol of a randomized clustered trial.“健康学校与毒品”通用预防计划的效果:一项随机整群试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2010 Sep 8;10:541. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-541.

引用本文的文献

1
Inhalant use and inhalant use disorders in the United States.在美国,吸入剂的使用和吸入剂使用障碍。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;6(1):18-31.
2
Examining How Context Changes Intervention Impact: The Use of Effect Sizes in Multilevel Mixture Meta-Analysis.审视情境如何改变干预效果:效应量在多水平混合元分析中的应用。
Child Dev Perspect. 2008 Nov 28;2(3):198-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00065.x.
3
Targeting high-risk neighborhoods for tobacco prevention education in schools.针对学校烟草预防教育的高风险社区。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Sep;100(9):1708-13. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.145557. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A home-based prevention program for sixth-grade alcohol use: Results from project Northland.一项针对六年级学生饮酒问题的家庭预防项目:北国项目的结果。
J Prim Prev. 1995 Dec;16(2):125-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02407336.
2
Preventing Substance Abuse Among American-Indian Adolescents: A Bicultural Competence Skills Approach.预防美国印第安青少年药物滥用:一种双文化能力技能方法。
J Couns Psychol. 1988 Jan;35(1):87-90.
3
Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs.传播和复制有效预防项目中的问题。
Prev Sci. 2004 Mar;5(1):47-53. doi: 10.1023/b:prev.0000013981.28071.52.
4
Evaluating the evidence of effectiveness for preventive interventions: using a registry system to influence policy through science.
Addict Behav. 2000 Nov-Dec;25(6):955-64. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(00)00131-3.
5
Experiments versus quasi-experiments: do they yield the same answer?实验与准实验:它们能得出相同的答案吗?
NIDA Res Monogr. 1997;170:147-64.
6
Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: results of the 1993 meta-analysis.青少年药物预防项目的荟萃分析:1993年荟萃分析的结果
NIDA Res Monogr. 1997;170:5-68.
7
Effectiveness of a school-based substance abuse prevention program.一项基于学校的药物滥用预防计划的有效性。
J Drug Educ. 1996;26(4):323-37. doi: 10.2190/E9HH-PBUH-802D-XD6U.
8
Effectiveness of a high school alcohol misuse prevention program.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1996 Aug;20(5):791-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb05253.x.
9
Project Northland: outcomes of a communitywide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence.北国计划:青春期早期一项社区范围内预防酒精使用计划的成果
Am J Public Health. 1996 Jul;86(7):956-65. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.7.956.
10
An outcome evaluation of Here's Looking At You 2000.
J Drug Educ. 1993;23(1):67-81. doi: 10.2190/WF2C-72QJ-TR9G-UNH1.

考察农村地区校本毒品预防项目对毒品使用的影响:方法与初步研究结果

Examining the effects of school-based drug prevention programs on drug use in rural settings: methodology and initial findings.

作者信息

Brown C Hendricks, Guo Jing, Singer L Terri, Downes Katheryne, Brinales Joseph M

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl(Suppl):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00121.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00121.x
PMID:18237322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2768124/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Although there have been substantial advances in knowledge about drug prevention over the last decade, the majority of school-based drug prevention studies have been conducted in urban settings. There is little knowledge about the effectiveness of such programs when they are implemented in rural populations.

PURPOSE

To examine the prevention effects of school-based drug prevention programs implemented in rural populations.

METHODS

Mixed model or 2-level meta-analysis of trials based on school-based drug prevention programs that included rural populations. A total of 182 trials were coded for urbanicity of schools and 22 separate trials were selected for the analysis conducted in this paper. A total of 435 distinct analyses were examined from these 22 trials.

FINDINGS

We found a modest but consistent beneficial impact of drug prevention programs on later use as well as level of use. Regarding later drug use, the largest impact was on those who were not using at baseline and those exposed to an interactive program; the results were much larger for marijuana and other drugs compared to alcohol or tobacco, while inhalant use was less affected than other drug categories. Regarding level of use, the impact was greatest 6 months after the trial ended, with diminishing effects thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence exists for a small but systematic beneficial effect of drug prevention programs in rural settings. It is likely that these programs have produced a mild reduction in new use of substances but have had little impact on those already using substances.

摘要

背景

尽管在过去十年里,关于药物预防的知识有了长足的进步,但大多数基于学校的药物预防研究都是在城市环境中进行的。对于这些项目在农村人口中实施时的效果,人们了解甚少。

目的

研究在农村人口中实施的基于学校的药物预防项目的预防效果。

方法

对纳入农村人口的基于学校的药物预防项目的试验进行混合模型或二级荟萃分析。总共对182项试验的学校城市化程度进行了编码,并选择了22项独立试验进行本文的分析。从这22项试验中总共检查了435项不同的分析。

结果

我们发现药物预防项目对后期使用以及使用水平有适度但一致的有益影响。关于后期药物使用,最大的影响是对基线时未使用药物的人和接触互动项目的人;与酒精或烟草相比,大麻和其他药物的结果要大得多,而吸入剂使用受到的影响比其他药物类别要小。关于使用水平,试验结束后6个月影响最大,此后影响逐渐减弱。

结论

有证据表明,在农村地区,药物预防项目有微小但系统的有益效果。这些项目可能使物质的新使用量略有减少,但对已经使用物质的人影响不大。