Brown C Hendricks, Guo Jing, Singer L Terri, Downes Katheryne, Brinales Joseph M
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
J Rural Health. 2007 Fall;23 Suppl(Suppl):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00121.x.
Although there have been substantial advances in knowledge about drug prevention over the last decade, the majority of school-based drug prevention studies have been conducted in urban settings. There is little knowledge about the effectiveness of such programs when they are implemented in rural populations.
To examine the prevention effects of school-based drug prevention programs implemented in rural populations.
Mixed model or 2-level meta-analysis of trials based on school-based drug prevention programs that included rural populations. A total of 182 trials were coded for urbanicity of schools and 22 separate trials were selected for the analysis conducted in this paper. A total of 435 distinct analyses were examined from these 22 trials.
We found a modest but consistent beneficial impact of drug prevention programs on later use as well as level of use. Regarding later drug use, the largest impact was on those who were not using at baseline and those exposed to an interactive program; the results were much larger for marijuana and other drugs compared to alcohol or tobacco, while inhalant use was less affected than other drug categories. Regarding level of use, the impact was greatest 6 months after the trial ended, with diminishing effects thereafter.
Evidence exists for a small but systematic beneficial effect of drug prevention programs in rural settings. It is likely that these programs have produced a mild reduction in new use of substances but have had little impact on those already using substances.
尽管在过去十年里,关于药物预防的知识有了长足的进步,但大多数基于学校的药物预防研究都是在城市环境中进行的。对于这些项目在农村人口中实施时的效果,人们了解甚少。
研究在农村人口中实施的基于学校的药物预防项目的预防效果。
对纳入农村人口的基于学校的药物预防项目的试验进行混合模型或二级荟萃分析。总共对182项试验的学校城市化程度进行了编码,并选择了22项独立试验进行本文的分析。从这22项试验中总共检查了435项不同的分析。
我们发现药物预防项目对后期使用以及使用水平有适度但一致的有益影响。关于后期药物使用,最大的影响是对基线时未使用药物的人和接触互动项目的人;与酒精或烟草相比,大麻和其他药物的结果要大得多,而吸入剂使用受到的影响比其他药物类别要小。关于使用水平,试验结束后6个月影响最大,此后影响逐渐减弱。
有证据表明,在农村地区,药物预防项目有微小但系统的有益效果。这些项目可能使物质的新使用量略有减少,但对已经使用物质的人影响不大。