Suppr超能文献

解剖结缝线锚钉与无结缝线锚钉技术在前距腓韧带修复中的生物力学比较

Anatomic Knot Suture Anchor Versus Knotless Suture Anchor Technique for Anterior Talofibular Ligament Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.

作者信息

Li Hong, Xu Hanlin, Hua Yinghui, Chen Wenbo, Li Hongyun, Chen Shiyi

机构信息

Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Jan 27;8(1):2325967119898125. doi: 10.1177/2325967119898125. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To date, there are few biomechanical studies comparing the strength between knot repair and knotless repair procedures for anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injury.

PURPOSE

To perform a biomechanical comparison of the strength of the arthroscopic ATFL repair technique with knot or knotless suture anchors in a cadaveric model with partial or complete ATFL injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric ankles were used. Arthroscopy was used to identify, section, and repair the ATFL on the fibular insertion site. The specimens were then randomly placed into 1 of 4 groups: group A received complete ATFL section and 1-suture anchor repair with knot, group B received complete ATFL section and 1-anchor knotless repair, group C received partial ATFL section and 1-suture anchor repair with knot, and group D received partial ATFL section and 1-anchor knotless repair. After repair, the ATFL tension was measured first with a digitalized tensiometer. Specimens were then mounted on a materials testing system to determine the ultimate load to failure and stiffness.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD ligament tension measured during the arthroscopic procedure was 8.6 ± 0.6 N for group A, 9.2 ± 0.5 N for group B, 9.4 ± 1.1 N for group C, and 9.6 ± 0.9 N for group D. No significant difference in tension was detected among groups. In load-to-failure testing, the mean ultimate failure load was 27.9 ± 4.1 N for group A, 26.2 ± 9.3 N for group B, 81.9 ± 26.5 N for group C, and 88.1 ± 41.6 N for group D. The mean ultimate failure loads of the partial repair groups were significantly higher than those of the complete repair groups (C vs A, = .008; D vs B, = .002), while there was no significant difference between groups A and B ( > .05) or between groups C and D ( > .05).

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study showed that there was no significant difference in biomechanical properties between knot repair and knotless repair techniques.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Biomechanically, the results showed that knot suture anchor and knotless suture repair provide similar biomechanical strength for ATFL injury. Unfortunately, these methods in the complete ATFL section models provided less than half the strength and stiffness in the partial ATFL section models at time zero after surgery. As a result, 1-suture anchor repair is not suitable for complete ATFL injury regardless of the repair method.

摘要

背景

迄今为止,很少有生物力学研究比较距腓前韧带(ATFL)损伤的打结修复和无结修复手术之间的强度。

目的

在部分或完全ATFL损伤的尸体模型中,对使用打结或无结缝合锚钉的关节镜下ATFL修复技术的强度进行生物力学比较。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

总共使用了24个新鲜冷冻的尸体踝关节。通过关节镜识别、切断并修复腓骨附着部位的ATFL。然后将标本随机分为4组中的1组:A组接受ATFL完全切断并使用1个缝合锚钉打结修复,B组接受ATFL完全切断并使用1个锚钉无结修复,C组接受ATFL部分切断并使用1个缝合锚钉打结修复,D组接受ATFL部分切断并使用1个锚钉无结修复。修复后,首先使用数字化张力计测量ATFL的张力。然后将标本安装在材料测试系统上,以确定最终破坏载荷和刚度。

结果

在关节镜手术过程中测量的韧带平均张力±标准差,A组为8.6±0.6 N,B组为9.2±0.5 N,C组为9.4±1.1 N,D组为9.6±0.9 N。各组之间未检测到张力有显著差异。在破坏载荷测试中,A组的平均最终破坏载荷为27.9±4.1 N,B组为26.2±9.3 N,C组为81.9±26.5 N,D组为88.1±41.6 N。部分修复组的平均最终破坏载荷显著高于完全修复组(C组与A组比较,P = 0.008;D组与B组比较,P = 0.002),而A组和B组之间(P>0.05)或C组和D组之间(P>0.05)无显著差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,打结修复和无结修复技术在生物力学性能上无显著差异。

临床意义

从生物力学角度来看,结果表明,打结缝合锚钉和无结缝合修复为ATFL损伤提供了相似的生物力学强度。不幸的是,在完全ATFL切断模型中,这些方法在术后零时提供的强度和刚度不到部分ATFL切断模型的一半。因此,无论采用何种修复方法,1个缝合锚钉修复都不适用于完全ATFL损伤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dceb/6985968/fe872a9daeaf/10.1177_2325967119898125-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验