Suppr超能文献

类似手机的射频辐射对特应性皮炎患者无影响。

No effect of mobile phone-like RF exposure on patients with atopic dermatitis.

作者信息

Johansson Amanda, Forsgren Sture, Stenberg Berndt, Wilén Jonna, Kalezic Nebojsa, Sandström Monica

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Jul;29(5):353-62. doi: 10.1002/bem.20402.

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of exposure to a mobile phone-like radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic field on people with atopic dermatitis (AD). Fifteen subjects with AD were recruited and matched with 15 controls without AD. The subjects were exposed for 30 min to an RF field at 1 W/kg via an indoor base station antenna attached to a 900 MHz GSM mobile phone. Blood samples for ELISA analysis of the concentration of substance P (SP), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNF R1), and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in serum were drawn before and after the provocation (exposure/sham). Baseline heart rate and heart rate variability, local blood flow, and electrodermal activity were also recorded. No significant differences between the subject groups were found for baseline neurophysiological data. The cases displayed a serum concentration of TNF R1 significantly higher than the control subjects and a significantly lower serum concentration of BDNF in the baseline condition. For SP there was no difference between groups. However, no effects related to RF exposure condition were encountered for any of the measured substances. As to symptoms, a possible correlation with exposure could not be evaluated, due to too few symptom reports. The result of the study does not support the hypothesis of an effect of mobile phone-like RF exposure on serum levels of SP, TNF R1, and BDNF in persons with AD.

摘要

本研究调查了暴露于类似手机的射频(RF)电磁场对特应性皮炎(AD)患者的影响。招募了15名AD患者,并与15名无AD的对照者进行匹配。通过连接到900 MHz GSM手机的室内基站天线,让受试者暴露于1 W/kg的RF场中30分钟。在激发(暴露/假暴露)前后采集血样,用于ELISA分析血清中P物质(SP)、肿瘤坏死因子受体1(TNF R1)和脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)的浓度。还记录了基线心率和心率变异性、局部血流量和皮肤电活动。在基线神经生理学数据方面,未发现受试者组之间存在显著差异。在基线条件下,病例组的TNF R1血清浓度显著高于对照组,而BDNF血清浓度显著低于对照组。对于SP,各组之间没有差异。然而,对于任何测量物质,均未发现与RF暴露条件相关的影响。至于症状,由于症状报告太少,无法评估与暴露的可能相关性。该研究结果不支持类似手机的RF暴露对AD患者血清中SP、TNF R1和BDNF水平有影响的假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验