Hillert Lena, Akerstedt Torbjörn, Lowden Arne, Wiholm Clairy, Kuster Niels, Ebert Sven, Boutry Clementine, Moffat Scott Douglas, Berg Mats, Arnetz Bengt Birger
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Apr;29(3):185-96. doi: 10.1002/bem.20379.
Findings from prior studies of possible health and physiological effects from mobile phone use have been inconsistent. Exposure periods in provocation studies have been rather short and personal characteristics of the participants poorly defined. We studied the effect of radiofrequency field (RF) on self-reported symptoms and detection of fields after a prolonged exposure time and with a well defined study group including subjects reporting symptoms attributed to mobile phone use. The design was a double blind, cross-over provocation study testing a 3-h long GSM handset exposure versus sham. The study group was 71 subjects age 18-45, including 38 subjects reporting headache or vertigo in relation to mobile phone use (symptom group) and 33 non-symptomatic subjects. Symptoms were scored on a 7-point Likert scale before, after 1(1/2) and 2(3/4) h of exposure. Subjects reported their belief of actual exposure status. The results showed that headache was more commonly reported after RF exposure than sham, mainly due to an increase in the non-symptom group. Neither group could detect RF exposure better than by chance. A belief that the RF exposure had been active was associated with skin symptoms. The higher prevalence of headache in the non-symptom group towards the end of RF exposure justifies further investigation of possible physiological correlates. The current study indicates a need to better characterize study participants in mobile phone exposure studies and differences between symptom and non-symptom groups.
先前关于手机使用可能产生的健康和生理影响的研究结果并不一致。激发试验中的暴露时间相当短,且参与者的个人特征定义不明确。我们研究了射频场(RF)在长时间暴露后,对自我报告症状的影响以及场的检测情况,研究对象为一个定义明确的研究组,其中包括报告有手机使用所致症状的受试者。该设计为一项双盲交叉激发试验,测试3小时的GSM手机暴露与假暴露的对比。研究组有71名年龄在18至45岁之间的受试者,其中38名受试者报告有与手机使用相关的头痛或眩晕(症状组),33名无症状受试者。在暴露1.5小时和2.75小时之前、之后,根据7分李克特量表对症状进行评分。受试者报告他们对实际暴露状态的判断。结果显示,与假暴露相比,射频暴露后头痛报告更为常见,主要原因是非症状组中头痛增加。两组对射频暴露的检测都不比随机猜测更好。认为射频暴露是真实存在的想法与皮肤症状有关。在射频暴露接近尾声时,非症状组中头痛患病率较高,这证明有必要进一步研究可能的生理关联。当前研究表明,在手机暴露研究中需要更好地描述研究参与者的特征,以及症状组和非症状组之间的差异。