Benes E, Groschl M, Seifert F, Pohl A
Institut für Allgemeine Physik, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8/134, A-1040 Wien, Austria.
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1998;45(5):1314-30. doi: 10.1109/58.726458.
A comparison is given between piezoelectrically excited bulk acoustic wave (BAW) and surface acoustic wave (SAW) elements with respect to their primary sensitivity functions and principal capabilities for sensor applications. The importance of mode purity for high dynamic range sensors is emphasized. Characteristic sensor examples are reviewed, and the special demands on the electronics for BAW and SAW elements in the sensor field are described (e.g., cable problem, wireless SAW sensors). For a fair evaluation, a performance figure, SQ, defined as the product of reduced sensitivity S and resonator Q-value, is introduced. The potential of alternative piezoelectric materials for future sensor developments is discussed briefly.
文中对压电激发体声波(BAW)元件和表面声波(SAW)元件在其主要灵敏度函数和传感器应用的主要能力方面进行了比较。强调了模式纯度对于高动态范围传感器的重要性。回顾了典型的传感器示例,并描述了传感器领域中BAW和SAW元件对电子设备的特殊要求(例如,电缆问题、无线SAW传感器)。为了进行公平评估,引入了一个性能指标SQ,定义为降低的灵敏度S与谐振器Q值的乘积。简要讨论了替代压电材料在未来传感器开发中的潜力。