Suppr超能文献

社区居住老年人中力量训练与肌肉力量特异性抗阻训练的对比

Strength versus muscle power-specific resistance training in community-dwelling older adults.

作者信息

Henwood Tim R, Riek Stephan, Taaffe Dennis R

机构信息

School of Human Movement Studies, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Jan;63(1):83-91. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.1.83.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loss of muscle power due to normal aging has greater functional impact than loss of strength alone. The present study compared two resistance training programs, one aimed at enhancing muscle power and one at increasing muscle strength, on muscle function and functional performance in older adults.

METHODS

Sixty-seven healthy, independent older adults (65-84 years) were randomized to a high-velocity varied resistance (HV), constant resistance (ST), or nontraining control (CO) group. Participants trained twice weekly for 24 weeks using six exercises. Dynamic and isometric muscle strength, muscle power, movement velocity, muscle endurance, and a battery of functional performance tasks were assessed. Secondary outcomes included body composition, quality of life, and balance confidence.

RESULTS

Muscle strength increased significantly (p <.001) and similarly in the training groups compared to controls (HV, 51.0 +/- 9.0%; ST, 48.3 +/- 6.8%; CO, 1.2 +/- 5.1%). Peak muscle power also increased with training (p <.05), with no difference between training groups. The change in peak power was 50.5 +/- 4.1%, 33.8 +/- 3.8%, and -2.5 +/- 3.9% in the HV, ST, and CO groups, respectively. Training also improved selected functional performance tasks in the HV and ST groups compared to controls (p <.05), and the HV group reported improved quality of life (p =.018).

CONCLUSION

Muscle power and muscle strength improved similarly using either resistance training protocol, and these changes were accompanied by improvements in several functional performance tasks. However, improvements in the HV group occurred with less total work performed per training session.

摘要

背景

正常衰老导致的肌肉力量丧失比单纯的力量丧失具有更大的功能影响。本研究比较了两种阻力训练方案,一种旨在增强肌肉力量,另一种旨在增加肌肉力量,对老年人肌肉功能和功能表现的影响。

方法

67名健康、独立的老年人(65 - 84岁)被随机分为高速可变阻力(HV)组、恒定阻力(ST)组或非训练对照组(CO)。参与者每周进行两次训练,共24周,采用六种练习。评估了动态和等长肌肉力量、肌肉力量、运动速度、肌肉耐力以及一系列功能表现任务。次要结果包括身体成分、生活质量和平衡信心。

结果

与对照组相比,训练组的肌肉力量显著增加(p <.001)且相似(HV组,51.0 +/- 9.0%;ST组,48.3 +/- 6.8%;CO组,1.2 +/- 5.1%)。峰值肌肉力量也随着训练而增加(p <.05),训练组之间无差异。HV组、ST组和CO组的峰值力量变化分别为50.5 +/- 4.1%、33.8 +/- 3.8%和 - 2.5 +/- 3.9%。与对照组相比,训练还改善了HV组和ST组中选定的功能表现任务(p <.05),并且HV组报告生活质量有所改善(p =.018)。

结论

使用任何一种阻力训练方案时,肌肉力量和肌肉力量的改善相似,并且这些变化伴随着几种功能表现任务的改善。然而,HV组在每次训练中完成较少的总工作量时就出现了改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验