Dayan Peter, Huys Quentin J M
Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Feb;4(2):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040004.
Pavlovian predictions of future aversive outcomes lead to behavioral inhibition, suppression, and withdrawal. There is considerable evidence for the involvement of serotonin in both the learning of these predictions and the inhibitory consequences that ensue, although less for a causal relationship between the two. In the context of a highly simplified model of chains of affectively charged thoughts, we interpret the combined effects of serotonin in terms of pruning a tree of possible decisions, (i.e., eliminating those choices that have low or negative expected outcomes). We show how a drop in behavioral inhibition, putatively resulting from an experimentally or psychiatrically influenced drop in serotonin, could result in unexpectedly large negative prediction errors and a significant aversive shift in reinforcement statistics. We suggest an interpretation of this finding that helps dissolve the apparent contradiction between the fact that inhibition of serotonin reuptake is the first-line treatment of depression, although serotonin itself is most strongly linked with aversive rather than appetitive outcomes and predictions.
巴甫洛夫对未来厌恶性结果的预测会导致行为抑制、压抑和退缩。有大量证据表明血清素参与了这些预测的学习以及随后产生的抑制性后果,尽管两者之间因果关系的证据较少。在一个高度简化的充满情感的思维链模型中,我们从修剪可能决策树的角度来解释血清素的综合作用(即消除那些预期结果低或为负的选择)。我们展示了行为抑制的下降(据推测是由实验性或精神性因素导致血清素下降所致)如何导致意外的大负性预测误差以及强化统计中的显著厌恶性转变。我们对这一发现提出一种解释,有助于化解血清素再摄取抑制是抑郁症一线治疗方法这一事实与血清素本身与厌恶性而非愉悦性结果及预测联系最为紧密之间的明显矛盾。