• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰口腔颌面外科医生施行的用于拔除上颌第三磨牙的腭部麻醉。

Palatal anaesthesia for the removal of maxillary third molars as practised by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.

作者信息

Badcock M E, McCullough M J

机构信息

School of Dental Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2007 Dec;52(4):329-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00510.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00510.x
PMID:18265690
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injections of local anaesthetic to the palate are well known to be poorly tolerated. The absolute requirement of a palatal injection for the removal of maxillary third molars has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to document the current practice of palatal anaesthesia for extraction of these teeth with local anaesthesia as practised by oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

METHODS

A postal survey was sent via the ANZAOMS office to all oral and maxillofacial surgeons who were members of the Australian and New Zealand Association, a total of 131. A response rate of 64 per cent (n = 84) was achieved. The frequency of administration and the factors that determined the decision to administer a palatal injection were assessed, as well as the methods employed for reducing the injection discomfort.

RESULTS

The majority (77 of the 84) "always" gave a palatal injection for the removal of maxillary third molars, four respondents administered an injection "most of the time", and two respondents "occasionally". Significantly, one respondent "never" gave a palatal injection. The majority (76 per cent) utilized at least one adjunct in order to reduce the discomfort of the injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey suggest that for removal of maxillary third molars the requirement of the poorly tolerated palatal injection may not be absolute as conventionally taught and demonstrates the need for further investigation.

摘要

背景

众所周知,对上腭进行局部麻醉注射的耐受性较差。上颌第三磨牙拔除术中对上腭注射的绝对必要性从未得到研究。本研究的目的是记录口腔颌面外科医生在使用局部麻醉拔除这些牙齿时进行腭部麻醉的当前做法。

方法

通过澳大利亚和新西兰口腔颌面外科医生协会办公室向该协会的所有131名口腔颌面外科医生发送了邮政调查问卷。回复率为64%(n = 84)。评估了注射的频率、决定进行腭部注射的因素,以及用于减轻注射不适的方法。

结果

大多数人(84人中的77人)“总是”在上颌第三磨牙拔除时进行腭部注射,4名受访者“大多数时候”进行注射,2名受访者“偶尔”进行注射。值得注意的是,有1名受访者“从不”进行腭部注射。大多数人(76%)使用了至少一种辅助手段来减轻注射的不适。

结论

本次调查结果表明,在上颌第三磨牙拔除术中,耐受性较差的腭部注射的必要性可能不像传统教导的那样绝对,这表明有必要进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Palatal anaesthesia for the removal of maxillary third molars as practised by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰口腔颌面外科医生施行的用于拔除上颌第三磨牙的腭部麻醉。
Aust Dent J. 2007 Dec;52(4):329-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00510.x.
2
Palatal Injection for the Removal of Maxillary Teeth: Current Practice Among Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.腭部注射用于拔除上颌牙齿:口腔颌面外科医生的当前实践
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;75(7):1376.e1-1376.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
3
Removal of third molars in Scottish oral and maxillofacial surgery units: a review of practice in 1995 and 2002.苏格兰口腔颌面外科科室中第三磨牙的拔除:1995年与2002年的实践回顾
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Aug;44(4):313-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.014. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
4
Palatal injection for removal of maxillary teeth: is it required? A systematic review.拔除上颌牙时腭部注射是否必要?一项系统评价
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;45(10):1283-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Buccal injection of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine for the removal of maxillary third molars.用于拔除上颌第三磨牙的2%利多卡因加肾上腺素颊部注射。
Anesth Prog. 2013 Fall;60(3):95-8. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-60.3.95.
6
Patients' assessment of surgical removal of mandibular third molars. An inquiry study.患者对下颌第三磨牙手术拔除的评估。一项调查研究。
Swed Dent J. 1997;21(3):93-9.
7
Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible?不进行腭部注射能拔除上颌恒牙吗?
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
8
Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.单颊侧浸润麻醉与常规颊侧及腭侧注射麻醉用于上颌恒牙拔除的效率比较
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Mar;107(3):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.08.025. Epub 2008 Nov 8.
9
A blinded randomized controlled trial comparing lignocaine and placebo administration to the palate for removal of maxillary third molars.一项比较利多卡因和安慰剂用于腭部以拔除上颌第三磨牙的双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Dec;36(12):1177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
10
Extraction of maxillary teeth by dental students without palatal infiltration of local anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.牙科学生在上颌牙齿拔除时不进行腭部局部麻醉浸润:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;21(4):e39-e42. doi: 10.1111/eje.12215. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Split-mouth Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine for Extractions of Deciduous Maxillary Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.阿替卡因与利多卡因用于上颌乳磨牙拔除术麻醉效果的自身对照比较:一项随机对照试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(Suppl 1):S6-S10. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2734.
2
Is it possible to extract primary maxillary molars without palatal injection?: a controlled clinical trial.是否可以不经腭内注射而拔除上颌第一磨牙?:一项对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Feb 26;28(3):174. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05565-x.
3
Can Single Buccal Infiltration With 4% Articaine Induce Sufficient Analgesia for the Extraction of Maxillary Teeth? A Systematic Literature Review.
4%阿替卡因单次颊侧浸润麻醉能否为上颌牙拔除提供足够的镇痛效果?一项系统文献综述。
Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42975. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42975. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Pulpal anesthesia of maxillary first molars using 4% articaine infiltration in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.在有症状的不可逆性牙髓炎患者中使用4%阿替卡因浸润进行上颌第一磨牙牙髓麻醉:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3999-4006. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05025-y. Epub 2023 May 27.
5
Transpapillary Injection Technique as a Substitute for Palatal Infiltration: A Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.经乳头注射技术替代腭部浸润麻醉:一项半口随机临床试验
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Sep-Oct;14(5):640-643. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2026.
6
Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.上颌牙拔除时不腭侧注射阿替卡因与利多卡因的对比研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.阿替卡因和利多卡因单次颊侧浸润与利多卡因常规颊侧和腭侧注射在上颌乳磨牙拔除术中的有效性:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):160-164. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.186589.