Emkanjoo Zahra, Mirza-Ali Mansour, Alizadeh Abollfath, Hosseini Saied, Jorat Mohammad Vahid, Nikoo Mohammad Hossein, Sadr-Ameli Mohammad Ali
Department of Pacemaker and Electrophysiology, Rajaie Cardiovascular Research and Medical Center,Tehran 1996911151,IRAN.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2008 Feb 1;8(1):14-21.
The risk of developing conduction disturbances after coronary bypass grafting (CABG) or valvular surgery has been well established in previous studies, leading to permanent pacemaker implantation in about 2% to 3% of patients, and in 10% of patients undergoing repeat cardiac surgery. We sought to determine the incidence, features and predictors of conduction disorders in the immediate post-operative period of patients subjected to open-heart surgery, and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation.
We prospectively studied 374 consecutive patients who underwent open-heart surgery in our institution: coronary artery bypass (CABG) (n=128), Mitral valve replacement(MVR)(n=18), aortic valve replacement(AVR) (n=21), MVR and AVR(n=56), repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD) (n=51), repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) (n=57),CABG and valvular surgery (n=6), others (n=37).
Among 374 patients included in our study (mean age 34.46+/-25.68; 146 males), 192 developed new conduction disorders: symptomatic sinus bradycardia in 8%, atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response (AF) in 4.5%, first-degree atrioventricular block (AVB)in 6.4%, second-degree AVB in 0.3%, third-degree AVB in 7%, new right bundle branch block (RBBB) in 33%, and new left bundle branch block (LBBB) in 2.1%. In 5.6% patients, a permanent pacemaker was implanted, 47.6% of them underwent valvular surgery. In 44.1% of patients the conduction defects occurred in the first 48 hr. after surgery. In CABG group, 29.7% of patients developed new conduction disturbances; the most common of them was symptomatic sinus bradycardia. After valvular surgery 44.2% of patients developed conduction disturbances, of those the most common was atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular response . After VSD and TOF repair, the most common conduction disturbance was new RBBB. Perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 1.9% of patients. The occurrence conduction disturbance was compared with patient age, sex, occurrence of perioperative MI, ejection fraction (EF), postoperative use of ss-adernergic receptor blocking agents and digitalis and type of cardiac surgery. By regression analysis there was a correlation between type of surgery and new conduction defects, being significant for CABG and TOF repair. Only the occurrence of perioperative MI was related to PPM implantation.
Irreversible AVB requiring a PPM is an uncommon complication after open-heart surgery. Peri-operative MI is a risk factor.
既往研究已充分证实冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)或瓣膜手术后发生传导障碍的风险,约2%至3%的患者需要植入永久性起搏器,而再次心脏手术患者中这一比例为10%。我们旨在确定心脏直视手术患者术后早期传导障碍的发生率、特征及预测因素,以及植入永久性起搏器的必要性。
我们对在我院连续接受心脏直视手术的374例患者进行了前瞻性研究:冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)(n = 128)、二尖瓣置换术(MVR)(n = 18)、主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)(n = 21)、MVR和AVR(n = 56)、室间隔缺损修补术(VSD)(n = 51)、法洛四联症修补术(TOF)(n = 57)、CABG和瓣膜手术(n = 6)、其他(n = 37)。
在我们研究纳入的374例患者(平均年龄34.46±25.68岁;146例男性)中,192例出现新的传导障碍:症状性窦性心动过缓占8%,伴有缓慢心室反应的心房颤动(AF)占4.5%,一度房室传导阻滞(AVB)占6.4%,二度AVB占0.3%,三度AVB占7%,新出现的右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)占33%,新出现的左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)占2.1%。5.6%的患者植入了永久性起搏器,其中47.6%接受了瓣膜手术。44.1%的患者传导缺陷发生在术后48小时内。在CABG组中,29.7%的患者出现新的传导障碍;最常见的是症状性窦性心动过缓。瓣膜手术后,44.2%的患者出现传导障碍,其中最常见的是伴有缓慢心室反应的心房颤动。VSD和TOF修补术后,最常见的传导障碍是新出现的RBBB。1.9%的患者发生围手术期心肌梗死(MI)。将传导障碍的发生情况与患者年龄、性别、围手术期MI的发生情况、射血分数(EF)、术后使用β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂和洋地黄以及心脏手术类型进行了比较。通过回归分析,手术类型与新的传导缺陷之间存在相关性,对CABG和TOF修补术具有显著意义。只有围手术期MI的发生与永久性起搏器植入有关。
需要植入永久性起搏器的不可逆性AVB是心脏直视手术后不常见的并发症。围手术期MI是一个危险因素。